Originally posted by bellringer
if you loose one copy can you loose a second copy to
and yes im over 21![]()
Hahaha, well lets just say you lost the whole stock of that game... help your fellow members out
and uhh... yeah I'm 21
The thing getting Rockstar in trouble is the character actions. The built-in models are not nude, the nude models are added by the 3rd party addition. The video clip you saw was NOT the default models. Trust me, I own the game and did the Hot Coffee mod to see what all the fuss is about. If you read the readme of the hack you see it says that they ADD the nude models by CHANGING a necessary file.I've seen a video clip of the scene, the chick IS nude. What bothers me though is that you need a hack to unlock it, using a hack you can probably add on a whole new section to the game, hell, you can convert it into an all out porn flick. It's not like you can unlock it using a cheat code or something. I think that this whole thing is absolutly rediculous and a waste of our tax $$. These people should be worrying about things that actually matter, let parents parent their own kids.
Rockstar knew about the content. There is no way that they didn't know. When you actually use the hack it has messages and everything explaining what to do. It is known content.Rock Star did not do this they had hidden content that was not known about at game release
This is the fifth game in the series. There was GTA, GTA:2, GTA:3, GTA: Vice City, and now GTA: SA. And the big fuss started with GTA3 and continued with GTA:VC and now is even more with GTA: SA.I don't really keep up to date with the games , but isn't this like the 3rd or 4th release of the game . I know I've heard of Vice City and I know there was one or two before then . You mean the the tight@asses were upset over those too ?
Well of course Rockstar knew the content was there but they did not make it public knowledge. My point was the ratings board and Joe Public had no idea the content was on the disk at the time the game was available.Rockstar knew about the content. There is no way that they didn't know. When you actually use the hack it has messages and everything explaining what to do. It is known content.


Originally posted by TruckStuff
For the forces of good, right? Taking down a drug dealer is one thing. Taking down a drug dealer so you can take over his territory is a little different.
but here is the problemOriginally posted by Busby
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/fun.games/ ... index.html
Great! I assumed this would happen eventually!
when says that it is for "M" what is 17+ ....14-year-old
Laurence D. Paskowitz, the lawyer who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Cohen, said no parent would knowingly buy an adult-only video game for their children

Originally posted by FlyingPenguin
I think it's hysterical that the game didn't qualify for AO rating in the first place. It's okay to sell crack and beat the crap out of people but not to screw a ho?
Originally posted by blade
Eggzactly!
Remember all the X Rated add-ons for Duke 3D and the Penthouse map. Not much was said about that, that I recall.