new tbird in. SHAWING!

Discussions and help regarding overclocking, motherboards, peripherals, AMD and INTEL CPU's
User avatar
VidmanII
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:54 pm
Location: Egg Harbor, NJ

Post by VidmanII »

Hey, congrats on getting thru all that but could you change the picture? I mean really.
AMD Ph II X4 955 BE 3.2 @ 3.8 GHz | Scythe SCSMZ-2000 | ASRock 880GMH/USB3 | 8 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 | Radeon HD5670 | Kingston 128GB SSD
Underclocked
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:52 am

Post by Underclocked »

Okay, just for you Todd, YOU WUSS!!! ;)

I suppose I'll try to find a pic of something less disturbing like a man killing someone, a devil, skull, or some other more acceptable theme.

EXCUUUUUUUUUUUSE MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!


Oh, and in case this picture is just as much a mystery, that is a GREY PANSY butterfly. In honor of my critics.
Underclocked
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:52 am

Post by Underclocked »

Hey, sorry if my previous avatar offended anyone (yeah, real sorry!!)

Almost forgot why I revisited this thread. 1200MHz (yep, busted my hymen) and that's far enough for right now although the AXIA K shows signs of wanting to go MUCH higher. I'm at 1.78vcore and currently at 42 degrees C as I type this. I only have one fan in my case aside from the ps fan and of course there is a fan on my copper-bottomed Taisol (a Volcano II fan), so my machine is still very tolerably quiet.

I can tell a wee bit of difference in the machine's speed but not enough to justify going higher (at least not yet). So, I'm still Underclocked below what she could do.
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

hehehe. ya got a gry thing with wings under your name.

I jacked the voltage up to 1.85 and have it at 1520mhz now. that is a 50% increase over defult speed. Pritty sweet.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
Underclocked
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:52 am

Post by Underclocked »

Oops, changed it again. Does this meet everyone's approval?
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

dna?

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
Underclocked
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:52 am

Post by Underclocked »

No, it was supposed to what one would see just after a fission. This one is supposed to be just before.
User avatar
VidmanII
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:54 pm
Location: Egg Harbor, NJ

Post by VidmanII »

Hey call me all the names you want if that makes you happy. Somehow a picture of a friggin' tumor ant my idea of tasteful.
AMD Ph II X4 955 BE 3.2 @ 3.8 GHz | Scythe SCSMZ-2000 | ASRock 880GMH/USB3 | 8 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 | Radeon HD5670 | Kingston 128GB SSD
Underclocked
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:52 am

Post by Underclocked »

Dang Todd, you used to at least try to be a decent fellow before you gave up smoking. Could you evaluate all the other avatars on this forum and give your opinion on taste? I'm sure everyone would like your approval.
User avatar
VidmanII
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:54 pm
Location: Egg Harbor, NJ

Post by VidmanII »

what ever u say. I guess I'm the bad guy here, eh Rich?
AMD Ph II X4 955 BE 3.2 @ 3.8 GHz | Scythe SCSMZ-2000 | ASRock 880GMH/USB3 | 8 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 | Radeon HD5670 | Kingston 128GB SSD
Underclocked
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:52 am

Post by Underclocked »

Frankly, I'm just a bit perplexed that you would take such personal offense at a stupid avatar. A simple email would have sufficed if you found it that objectionable. Instead, I get pm'd by Blade, bashed by you for my lack of taste (nice skull by the way, very appropriate and in fine taste).
Now, you want to name a bad guy??? You got some kind of vendetta going here or are you just working your way up to something?
Funny, I thought we were more or less on friendly terms. Guess I was wrong, EH?

This is now dropped from my end. Guess if we kept it up it might liven up the forum a little but I'm bored with the whole thing.
User avatar
VidmanII
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:54 pm
Location: Egg Harbor, NJ

Post by VidmanII »

Hey listen, I'm as happy as the next guy that you beat the big "C". But if you're "perplexed" by the fact that someone doesn't really care to look at some diseased body part (be it of avatar size or 8x10) then you're screwy. Further, you describe it as a "nice" mystery pic. Uh, huh, ok. Trust me when I tell you, I wasn't the only one who was put off by it.

The skull is cartoonish in nature and isn't that different from what's on the helmets of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I doubt you'll be seeing anything like your pic being used as a logo. Although, the Tennesee Tumors does have a "nice" ring to it. :lol

Should we look forward to seeing other "nice" pics of Ebola, AIDS or Black Lung?
AMD Ph II X4 955 BE 3.2 @ 3.8 GHz | Scythe SCSMZ-2000 | ASRock 880GMH/USB3 | 8 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 | Radeon HD5670 | Kingston 128GB SSD
Post Reply