IPTV vs custom home networks

Networking and broadband talkabout. Need help with that new router or setting up a network?
Post Reply
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

IPTV vs custom home networks

Post by b-man1 »

so after using my new fiber service for a day, i realized i had a few networking issues that needed to be corrected. i've been using my own router behind my cable and dsl modems in the past (loaded with DD-WRT). i also have several devices that need port forwarding rules and firewall exceptions. what happened is i completely forgot about the problems introduced with the new service and the router plugged in front of mine.

since the new fiber service is brought in over ethernet, they put a router in front of mine, resulting in a double-NAT situation (resulting in all port forwarding to fail). no big deal, as this happens with other services...just put the ISP provided router (well, gateway) into bridge mode and keep using my DD-WRT as usual. that works fine for internet, but IPTV requires multicast to work. enabling that on your network will destroy your wireless and probably any performance you ever thought you had.

to fix it, i just moved the port that the IPTV box is connected to to the same vLAN that the WAN port uses. this isolated it from the rest of the network and everything magically works again. i got lucky, as this may not work with every provider and then things get messy real quick or just never work quite right.

now that the IPTV traffic is on my network and going through my router, i can also monitor the bandwidth used. it seems to average around 2-3Mbps for TV.

whew!
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Nice & yet simple workaround. I wonder if they allowed that for just this reason?
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

i made the change on my router, not on theirs. it's just a check box in DD-WRT and not a physical cabling change. the alternative is multiple config changes and splitting wireless and LAN to their own vLANs, then scripting rules to block multicast traffic.
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

My bad, I misread. Yeah, I'd have giving up if it wasn't as simple as that.
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

i spoke too soon...i found out the DVR and video on demand services still wouldn't work properly. sigh. i'll need to dig into it more and see if it's even possible to get everything working without using their modem. sigh.
Post Reply