Star Trek
- EvilHorace
- Life Member
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
- Location: Greenfield, WI
Star Trek
Can't believe no one's commented here about this yet. Great Movie!
Just saw it earlier this afternoon and I was impressed, they pulled it off well whereas when I first heard about it, I had my doubts.
If you haven't already, go see it.
Just saw it earlier this afternoon and I was impressed, they pulled it off well whereas when I first heard about it, I had my doubts.
If you haven't already, go see it.
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
- Executioner
- Life Member
- Posts: 10221
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
- Location: Woodland, CA USA
- FlyingPenguin
- Flightless Bird
- Posts: 32977
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
- Location: Central Florida
- Contact:
I haven't seen it yet. Waiting to catch an early matinee.
If you're a nit-picking Trekkie like me, let me warn you that this is a "re-imagining" of Star Trek, just like BSG was a re-imagining of the old Battlestar Galactica, and like Smallville was a re-imagining of Superman.
As such, they will violate a lot of the known history of Star Trek, change the technology, and change the social dynamics. So although this is done in the spirit of Star Trek TOS, this is not not your father's Star Trek.
If you keep that in mind, then you can have fun watching it. By all reports it's very good.
If you're a nit-picking Trekkie like me, let me warn you that this is a "re-imagining" of Star Trek, just like BSG was a re-imagining of the old Battlestar Galactica, and like Smallville was a re-imagining of Superman.
As such, they will violate a lot of the known history of Star Trek, change the technology, and change the social dynamics. So although this is done in the spirit of Star Trek TOS, this is not not your father's Star Trek.
If you keep that in mind, then you can have fun watching it. By all reports it's very good.
---
“Be careful when a democracy is sick; fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health.”
― Albert Camus

“Be careful when a democracy is sick; fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health.”
― Albert Camus

Thanks FP. I haven't seen it yet but I was wondering how Kirk and Spock could be at Starfleet together when Spock was serving under Christopher Pike at the time on the Enterprise. Knowing that it's a re-imaging make sense.FlyingPenguin wrote:I haven't seen it yet. Waiting to catch an early matinee.
If you're a nit-picking Trekkie like me, let me warn you that this is a "re-imagining" of Star Trek, just like BSG was a re-imagining of the old Battlestar Galactica, and like Smallville was a re-imagining of Superman.
As such, they will violate a lot of the known history of Star Trek, change the technology, and change the social dynamics. So although this is done in the spirit of Star Trek TOS, this is not not your father's Star Trek.
If you keep that in mind, then you can have fun watching it. By all reports it's very good.
- EvilHorace
- Life Member
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
- Location: Greenfield, WI
When you see it, you'll see that IMO, they pulled that off correctly. Pike WAS there too. The movie seems historically accurate from my recollection. Like Ex mentions, the only strange part is Nimoy's role although it does tie things together for this movie.I haven't seen it yet but I was wondering how Kirk and Spock could be at Starfleet together when Spock was serving under Christopher Pike at the time on the Enterprise.
Yeah, the ship's technically far better than the TV series was in '66 but after 43 years, you'ld expect that too.
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
- eGoCeNTRoNiX
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
- Location: HELL
Was it just me or did they actually pus the dates further into the future? i.e. the original ST was like 2012 or something remotely close and I think in this one it was something like 2220? or something? I don't recall, was too absorbed int he movie 
eGo

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!

Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX

Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
No, they got the timeline right. 2012 would have predated them having warp drive and meeting the VulcanseGoCeNTRoNiX wrote:Was it just me or did they actually pus the dates further into the future? i.e. the original ST was like 2012 or something remotely close and I think in this one it was something like 2220? or something? I don't recall, was too absorbed int he movie
eGo

When all else fails, replace the user.
- FlyingPenguin
- Flightless Bird
- Posts: 32977
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
- Location: Central Florida
- Contact:
Evil: There are a lot of things "wrong" according to the original series timeline: The Enterprise is much bigger, it was built in a different location, Kirk commanded at least one other ship prior to the Enterprise, I could go on but they would be spoilers.
As long as you accept that it's a whole new Star Trek universe then it's okay.

As long as you accept that it's a whole new Star Trek universe then it's okay.

---
“Be careful when a democracy is sick; fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health.”
― Albert Camus

“Be careful when a democracy is sick; fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health.”
― Albert Camus

- EvilHorace
- Life Member
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
- Location: Greenfield, WI