NHRA shortens race distance for Top Fuel and Funny Car classes to 1,000 feet

This car is systematic, hyyydromatic...why it's greased lightning!
Post Reply
User avatar
Err
Life Member
Posts: 5842
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:54 am

NHRA shortens race distance for Top Fuel and Funny Car classes to 1,000 feet

Post by Err »

NHRA shortens race distance for Top Fuel and Funny Car classes to 1,000 feet as an interim safety measure
As the investigation continues into the tragic accident that took the life of driver Scott Kalitta, NHRA has announced that beginning at the Mopar Mile High Nationals in Denver, Colo., both the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes will race to 1,000 feet instead of the traditional 1,320 feet or one-quarter mile. This is an interim step that is being taken while NHRA continues to analyze and determine whether changes should be made to build upon the sport's long standing safety record, given the inherent risks and ever-present dangers associated with the sport.

This interim change was made by NHRA in collaboration with professional race teams. NHRA believes that racing the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes to 1,000 feet will allow NHRA and the racing community time to evaluate, analyze and implement potential changes based on the safety initiatives outlined last week.

With the change, fans will still be able to enjoy the sights, sounds and thrill of NHRA nitro racing with speeds around 300 mph and quick elapsed times to 1,000 feet.

Over the years, NHRA has implemented many initiatives to enhance safety including measures to limit speeds from increasing, personal protective gear, vehicle improvements, and track enhancements such as sand traps, catch nets and concrete barriers the entire length of the drag strip.

In the wake of the tragic series of events that took Kalitta's life, the following technical issues are currently under investigation: 1) what might be done to reduce engine failures; 2) parachute mounting techniques and materials as well as identifying a parachute material that could be more fire resistant; 3) exploring whether there is a way to increase brake efficiency when cars lose downforce due to the loss of the body; 4) analyzing additional methods that might be developed at the top end of the race track to help arrest runaway vehicles; 5) considering whether current speeds should be further limited or reduced to potentially improve safety.

“The board members of the Professional Racers Owners Organization (PRO) wholeheartedly and unanimously support this decision,” said its president Kenny Bernstein. “We want to thank NHRA for listening to our input and suggestions to incorporate these changes. It is not lost on any of us that this constitutes a change in our history of running a quarter-mile, but it's the most immediate adjustment we can make in the interest of safety which is foremost on everyone's mind. This may be a temporary change and we recognize it is not the total answer. We will continue to work hand in hand with NHRA to evaluate other methods of making Top Fuel and Funny Car competition safer so that we might return to our quarter-mile racing standard. We also want to thank Connie Kalitta for his invaluable input. He has been a rock through these difficult times.”
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

dumb
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7512
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

Well lets just get rid of the cars all together. then it will be safer. better make everybody wear full saftey suits all the time and have the run the 1/4 mile. no wait thats too dangerous, sombody could fall and scrape an elbow.

Im sick of racing bodys nerfing the sport. So what if some people die, they knew that when they went into it.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Did they make the nascar tracks shorter when Earnhardt died? Did they reduce the top speeds? I don't think so... So WTF is going on here?

Idiots..

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

no, they required the hans device and made safer barriers. A solution, not a downgrade.
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
Err
Life Member
Posts: 5842
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:54 am

Post by Err »

This is not the answer to the problem. The tracks need longer shutdown areas. Even if the track were 1000 feet, Scott Kalita still would have died. His parachutes were on FIRE!

I also have a problem with slowing the cars down. This is drag racing! As the speeds increase, the technology will evolve to meet the demand for safety. I think every track should have 1 mile of shutdown area and then sand with nets. Don't kill the excitement of the sport. I've seen these cars in person. There's nothing like it. You actually feel the ground shake and the noise in unbelievable.
Post Reply