Western Digital VelociRaptor Hard Drive Review on ExtremeTech

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Western Digital VelociRaptor Hard Drive Review on ExtremeTech

Post by FlyingPenguin »

If you have to have the fastest drive, this thing is FAST...

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1 ... 834,00.asp
Final Thoughts: Speed versus Capacity versus Price

Overall performance is quite good, while write performance is particularly excellent—and likely to be better than most (but not all) solid state drives. However, even at $299, it's still vastly less expensive than solid state drives of much lower capacity. Given its substantial performance advantage over 7,200RPM drives, we'll no doubt see these arriving in most enthusiast-class systems and lower-end workstations. For those users, performance trumps capacity for the system drive. After all, you can always add a big 7,200RPM drive (or array) as a secondary drive, if you need capacity.

One other thing to consider: The VelociRaptor is designed to enterprise class standards, with a 1.2 million hour MTBF rating—considerably more than most standard 7,200RPM desktop drives. That's something else to consider, particularly if you plan on running in a striped array configuration.

If you crave the fastest rotating hard drive for desktop PCs, then you'll want the VelociRaptor. While the price per unit capacity ratio is high relative to its 640GB, 7,200RPM cousin, it's much speedier in real world applications. However, it is limited to 300GB, so if you crave more drive space, you'll want to either use multiple drives in a striped array or give up some performance and go with a bigger drive. If performance rules your world, you'll want at least two...{more}
Image
The drive has a unique appearance. As you can see from the photos, this is really a 2.5-inch mechanism built into a 3.5-inch, cast metal sled that also acts as a heat sink, something the WDC marketing folks have labeled the "IcePAK."
Image
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

good stuff! the sweet spot for enterprise (mid-tier) storage IMHO is the 2.5" 15k SAS drives. they run us about ~$340/drive. it would be nice to start seeing that type of technology at the consumer level. the controllers would add a good chunk to the cost though. some day...
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

b-man1 wrote:good stuff! the sweet spot for enterprise (mid-tier) storage IMHO is the 2.5" 15k SAS drives. they run us about ~$340/drive. it would be nice to start seeing that type of technology at the consumer level. the controllers would add a good chunk to the cost though. some day...
its wd... what good is speed if u rebuild the computer every month
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

I have never had a raptor fail. I had my first 36gb ones for about 3-4 years, and I have now had my 150gb raptors for about 2-3 years already.

These look great though. I wish I had some $. would put 2 of those in raid0 like I have now.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

TheSovereign wrote:its wd... what good is speed if u rebuild the computer every month
i was only commented about the technology...other than the rated MTBF, i have no experience with this new WD drive. i had an old raptor that i sold to a coworker years ago...it's still going strong. it's 4-5 yrs old now i think.

regarding the SAS drives i mentioned, i've only seen one fail at work so far...and that's with about 50 of them in service for over a year in various configurations. i would have check and see who manufactures the SAS drives, but i don't think it's WD (i could be wrong, of course)

http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quic ... 4_div.html
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Hmmm, I never was much into superfast drives, but at this performance I may be considering (if the price ever drops closer to $150). I am starting to despise the lag after everything else is maxed out.
User avatar
Key Keeper
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:17 pm
Location: Austin TX

Post by Key Keeper »

Guess Ive been lucky. Ive owned WD,Max, and SG and only hdd that ever failed on me was the Maxtor. My raid 0 array (WD 80gig) is 3 1/2 years old (knocks on wood)
[email="chevelle.h@gmail.com"][color="red"]MAIL[/color][/email]
Post Reply