Whats the difference?

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
RubberDuckie
Posts: 2854
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 3:38 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Whats the difference?

Post by RubberDuckie »

Between the ClawHammer and the Venice? Besides $40 on the same speed. Is it worth the $40 on a 3500+?
JSTMF
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

I think the clawhammers are Socket 754 and the Venice is Socket 939

***EDIT***

Just double checked and I'm right.. If you want future proof and Dual Core availability in the future, get the Venice..

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
RubberDuckie
Posts: 2854
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 3:38 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by RubberDuckie »

when I search CPU on newegg and sort by socket 939 I get both?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819103514
JSTMF
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Hmmm.. You're right.. :) With these findings, I'm not 100% sure on the difference other than the Venice Core is newer than the clawhammer and supposed to be "The OC" chip.. Sorry for that bit of misinfo up there.. :)

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Venice core runs cooler, lower power consumption and it's reputed to be very overclockable.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
Key Keeper
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:17 pm
Location: Austin TX

Post by Key Keeper »

More "overclock" friendly than the Winchester?
[email="chevelle.h@gmail.com"][color="red"]MAIL[/color][/email]
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Supposedly. Everyone at the AMD Tech Tour was talking about that. They were hoping that the mobo/CPU combos came with Venice core CPUs (they did) because they were more overclockable.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Yah, I have a 3200+ Winnie and I've gotten it to 225mhz stable on the FSB with Corsair XMS 3200.. I'd like to save up some more money and get my hands on some PC4000 and see what it can do..

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
Key Keeper
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:17 pm
Location: Austin TX

Post by Key Keeper »

What mobo are you using??? I set my fsb to 270 and have no instability issues. Are you setting a "max mem clock" in your bios? 270fsb with "max mem clock" of 333=2.43ghz with mem running at 222mhz (asus a8n mobo). Corsair xms1024c2pt mem.
[email="chevelle.h@gmail.com"][color="red"]MAIL[/color][/email]
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

I'm using an MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum. I haven't dove into it to test all the settings.. It's fast enough as it is, but I might mess with it some later..

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
Post Reply