slow network transfer

Networking and broadband talkabout. Need help with that new router or setting up a network?
Post Reply
User avatar
RaT
Golden Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:03 pm
Location: Torrance, CA

slow network transfer

Post by RaT »

what are the causes for slow file transfer? i have one of my pc's connected to my network via a usb wireless adapter. it takes about 50 mins to transfer a 300mb file. what's up with that.

other than that everything else seems fine. computers can "see & talk" to each other. internet browsing is fine on the wireless PC.
"I didn't do it!!!!"
__________________
123cool
Golden Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 4:14 pm
Location: England

Post by 123cool »

well

USB 2.0's has a 480 megabits per second maximum data transfer

so thats the prob right there use a proper network card instead...
Athlon 4400 X2, @ 2.5Ghz, 1.375v validation
Corsair 3200C2 2.5-3-3-6 @ 1T Twinx 2GB,
Nvidia 7800GTX 256MB XFX @ 467/1.28,
A8N Sli Premium ASUS,
250GB Maxtor Maxline 3,
Sound Blaster Audigy 2ZS.

3DMark05 = 8434

Image
User avatar
RaT
Golden Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:03 pm
Location: Torrance, CA

Post by RaT »

ok.. but even at that transfer rate it shouldn't take that long (50 minutes for 300mb file) right?
"I didn't do it!!!!"
__________________
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Yah, even at that it's 60MBps.. USB 2.0 has a higher bandwidth than a normal LAN connection btw.. ;) So the USB isn't the bottle neck.. I had this problem a while back with one of my onboard NICs, You might dry updating the drivers.. GL!

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

USB NICs are usually VERY slow. Just because USB 2.0 is CAPABLE of high data transfer, most USB Nics can't actually achieve those speeds.

I've NEVER seen a 100Mbit USB Nic that was actually capable of anywhere near that data transfer speed.

You're better off with a PCI card NIC.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
TheGirter
Senior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 6:53 pm
Contact:

Post by TheGirter »

Originally posted by FlyingPenguin
USB NICs are usually VERY slow. Just because USB 2.0 is CAPABLE of high data transfer, most USB Nics can't actually achieve those speeds.

I've NEVER seen a 100Mbit USB Nic that was actually capable of anywhere near that data transfer speed.

You're better off with a PCI card NIC.


Exactly. I had a 10/100 USB NIC that I used and I rarely got above 10Mbps. After I installed a 3Com PCI NIC I got nearly all of 100Mbps.
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Originally posted by TheGirter
Exactly. I had a 10/100 USB NIC that I used and I rarely got above 10Mbps. After I installed a 3Com PCI NIC I got nearly all of 100Mbps.


I have never gotten above 50% utilization of the network even when using all PCI NICs....
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
TheGirter
Senior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 6:53 pm
Contact:

Post by TheGirter »

Originally posted by eGoCeNTRoNiX
I have never gotten above 50% utilization of the network even when using all PCI NICs....


This was between an OpenBSD box and FreeBSD box on my LAN, separated by a Netgear 8-port switch. Both had customized kernels and significantly customized userlands. Not sure how this would be in a Windows environment.
User avatar
Busby
Golden Member
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 6:25 pm
Location: Atlanta Area, GA, USA
Contact:

Post by Busby »

You're all missing the point! Reread the original post! He is using a <b>WIRELESS</b> adapter. Assuming 802.11g, a sustained 35 Mbps transfer rate would yield a 4.3 MBps transfer which would mean just over a minute transfer. Assuming 802.11b, a sustained 5 Mbps transfer rate would yield .625 MBps transfer which would take about 8 minutes. But that is all sustained rates and not accounting for the dips in the transfer. However, 50 minutes is an insane amount of time. Something isn't right and it isn't the USB adapter's fault necessarily. Get a utility that allows you to see the transfer speed and see what it says.
<a href="mailto:busby1218@charter.net">
<img src="http://justinbusby.com:8080/signature.gif" border="0"></a>
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Okay I missed that it was wireless. Yeah, that's slow, but then again it's wireless. How far from the access point? How good a signal. Your actual bandwidth varies with signal strength.

When my laptop's on the far end of the house and I try to sync my files, the data transfer rate is pretty crummy.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
theophilusmousse
Senior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:36 am
Location: Valpo

Post by theophilusmousse »

may be a stupid idea, but have you tried power-cycling the wireless unit? occasionally all it takes is a swift kick in the reset button... just a thought.
Run, run, run, as fast as you can...
you can't catch me, I'm the Stinky Cheese Man.
User avatar
RaT
Golden Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:03 pm
Location: Torrance, CA

Post by RaT »

the PC connected to the wireless adapter is in the same room as the router, probably about 6 feet away.

anyway i had an extra NIC lying around, installed it and all seems good now. that 300+mb file took about 3-5 minutes to transfer, so i guess we can say it had something to do with the USB wireless adapter itself.
"I didn't do it!!!!"
__________________
Post Reply