Partitions

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10354
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Partitions

Post by Executioner »

I'm assembling my new rig, and I'm gong to have the following HD's:
18 gig SCSI boot drive
120 gig Segate IDE HD
80 gig Maxtor IDE HD

On my current old rig, I have 2 40 gig HD's, with the primary divided into 3 partitions. Not sure if I want to do the same with these new HD's.

So you guy with large HD's and a single partition, is there a performance hit?

The only drive I will be backing up will be the SCSI HD. The 120 and the 80 will be mainly storage and games. Any files lost on these will not be that big of a deal.

Just wanted to see what strategy you guys use with these large HD's, and recommendations.
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

yes, there is a proformance hit. It isnt a big deal but it's there.

I dont partition mine anymore. I just dont like it.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
DocSilly
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:24 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DocSilly »

I would just use one partition per HDD ... that'll give you 3 partitions, enough to divide stuff on the seperate partitions/HDDs.
<a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/" title="Get Firefox - Web Browsing Redefined"><img src="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons/takebacktheweb_small.png" width="125" height="50" border="0" alt="Get Firefox"></a> <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/" title="Get Thunderbird - Reclaim Your Inbox"><img src="http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/buttons/reclaimyourinbox_small.png" width="125" height="80" border="0" alt="Get Thunderbird"></a>
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10354
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Post by Executioner »

Image
Intresting setup.

I had always kept my apps & data on the OS partition. I then had:
A games partition
Download partition
Newsgroups partition ;)
Transfered to CD partition

Seems like a logical setup there FP. Thanks for the tip.
blade
Posts: 9113
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 1:56 am
Location: LV-426
Contact:

Post by blade »

Originally posted by DocSilly
I would just use one partition per HDD ... that'll give you 3 partitions, enough to divide stuff on the seperate partitions/HDDs.


Ditto

That's what I do with mine. Though I have a 160gb partitioned to 40 and 120, 40 for xp and related apps/programs. My 2nd hard drive a 120gb, it as it is. Great for storing things in one place. I've learned it's better and easier. If there is a performance hit, I doubt you'd see it.
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=blade&border=0,0,64&custom=21,138,255&label=79,79,255&header=149,202,255&stats=0,255,255&bgcolor=0,0,181&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="www.Statgfx.com" />
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
Post Reply