Norton System Doctor sucks donkey b@lls!!!!

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Norton System Doctor sucks donkey b@lls!!!!

Post by FlyingPenguin »

If you EVER find it running in a clients system, UNINSTALL THAT CRAP!

I hate Norton System Doctor - code bloated P.O.S. that it is, and it's always causing problems on client's systems. Now I have another reason to hate it.

To be fair it's version 2001, but I think (from reading the newsgroups) that newer versions also do this.

I couldn't install a new hardware device on a client's system yesterday. Actually was re-installing the AOL dialer which is treated as a hardware network device in Windows, but this will affect ANY hardware you try to install.

It would hang during the "Updating Hardware Information Database" progress bar dialog that comes up any time you install new hardware.

Never ran into this before so did some Google searching. Unfortunately I was ASSUMING it was an AOL issue so all my Google searches were based on that and I came up with nothing the first hour. Spen another hour trying to debug it with no success.

Then I decided to do a search on "Updating Hardware Information Database Hangs" and hit paydirt.

Seems that Norton System Doctor creates - over time- THOUSANDS of zero size OEMxxx.inf files in the \Windows\INF folder.

Eventually you get so many files in there (tens of thousands of them) that Windows takes FOREVER to sort through them (which is what it's doing when that "Updating Hardware Information Database" dialog comes up).

Sooner or later you also hit the 65534 max file limit per folder in FAT32. Long before that though the computer starts running slower and you can't install new hardware.

This system had over 29,000 of them!

The fix is to delete all the zero size OEMxxx.INF files (BUT NOT the non-zero length ones).

To make matters worse, since this was a WinME system, and Win9x is notorious for having issues dealing with zero size files. It takes a LOT longer (and I mean A LOT) to delete a lot of zero size files than it normally takes to delete or move larger ones. Also Win9x throws fits when you try to delete a really large number of them at one time.

Since the INF folder is a protected system folder you can't just rename it and and copy the 500 or so legit INF files to a new INF folder, and it takes even longer to delete them in DOS sooooo....


Bottom line: it took me AN HOUR to delete all 29,000+ files. I was forced to do it in Safe Mode (normal mode actually became unstable deleting all those files after a while and Explorer would hang). I was forced to delete them 1000 at a time (any more and it would greatly slow down the process, and sometimes cause Explorer to hang). Windows REALLY doesn't like zero size files :(

Took 4 hours to do a 1 hour job. By the time I was done I was ready to smash the monitor when I saw a progress bar. Oh thank you Symantec..... :bum
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
d_b
Posts: 2617
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:16 am
Location: Culver Indiana

Post by d_b »

That sucks. I would have been thinking "format" after the first hour. :D
I'm not lazy by nature, I work very hard at being lazy.
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

anything symantec touches breaks

the only symantec products that are any good is the AV
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10354
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Post by Executioner »

Originally posted by TheSovereign
anything symantec touches breaks

the only symantec products that are any good is the AV
Well, version 2003 and greater have a bloat problem also. I"m still using 2001 and 2002 AV products with no problems, but I has some issues with 2003, and I know people on this board had problems with 2004.

The only utilities that I installed are:
1. AV program
2. Adware / Spybot Seach and Destroy
3. Spyware Blaster
4. Registry First Aid

You really don't need anything more, as they seem to cause more problems than they try to fix.
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

I've had System Works 2003 installed every since it came out with no problems. That being said the first thing I do is DISABLE System Doctor. Basically all I use is the AV and I run Win Doctor every once in a while. Also a big fan of Norton Ghost which ingrates into the System Works suite.
Image
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

2002 was the BEST AV program they ever wrote, and I advise my clients to keep 2002 if they have it. 2003 introduced MAJOR code bloat and 2004 has been buggy as sin.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
blackhawk
Golden Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 4:58 pm
Location: Ontario Canada

Post by blackhawk »

I agree, been buying the pro suite for 4 years, first year I installed everything, next year only a couple things and for this year, AV only. Used to have lots of problems linked back to their utilities.

I like ghost too but I can just reuse it off the old ones.
I Am Canadian

DFI Lanparty Ultra-D/AMD Opteron 165(9 x 270) /2x512mb Crucial Ballistix 3200/Nvidia 7900GT/LianLi V1000 + Antec Neo/WinXPpro/ Western Digital JDKS 250gb x 2/LG 16X Multidrive/Dell 1907FP

Asus A8N-E/AMD 64 3500+(11 x 255)/2x512 Corsair XMS 3200/Antec Sonata/ATI X800XL/WinXP/Maxtor 10 300gb x 2/LG 16X Multidrive/Dell FPW2005

Heat 219-0-0
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

I use Ghost too, but I don't install it in my systems. I just use it from a boot disk.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
Post Reply