Got my 2200+ today :D

Discussions and help regarding overclocking, motherboards, peripherals, AMD and INTEL CPU's
Post Reply
User avatar
cak
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:37 am
Location: Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

Got my 2200+ today :D

Post by cak »

After and enermax PS took out half my system, i replaced my 1800+ with a 2200+. Running a nothing special coolermaster and it's perfectly stable at 1.9ghz default voltage. I was fairly concernd by most of what i read, thinking i wasn't going to get much out of it, but i'm pretty happy so far. Course, I may not get much father then 1.9.....but a 2400+ will solve that problem :)
Athlon XP 2400+ | soltek 75DRV5 | Radeon 8500 | 512 samsung pc2700

Join the PCA Folding team!
http://folding.stanford.edu/
Team #78
User avatar
blackhawk
Golden Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 4:58 pm
Location: Ontario Canada

Post by blackhawk »

Do you find the temps much higher?

With the newer steppings the temps seem a bit more even on an overclock.
Your old 1800 chugging along fine.

I'm figuring that a 2200+ will be my last XP and next upgrade. :)
I Am Canadian

DFI Lanparty Ultra-D/AMD Opteron 165(9 x 270) /2x512mb Crucial Ballistix 3200/Nvidia 7900GT/LianLi V1000 + Antec Neo/WinXPpro/ Western Digital JDKS 250gb x 2/LG 16X Multidrive/Dell 1907FP

Asus A8N-E/AMD 64 3500+(11 x 255)/2x512 Corsair XMS 3200/Antec Sonata/ATI X800XL/WinXP/Maxtor 10 300gb x 2/LG 16X Multidrive/Dell FPW2005

Heat 219-0-0
User avatar
Bigal
Senior Member
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 9:00 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Long live the Thoroughbred chip....

Post by Bigal »

blackhawk:

Even though I bought the Thoroughbred Athlon XP 2200+ early in the release cycle (meaning I have the rev A chip), I've been very happy with it's performance. I couldn't go much above 1.9 GHz using the default voltage, so I left it there. I understand the rev B chip has that extra layer and is much more capable of higher frequency operation. Maybe you got the rev B chip - it's only a very slight increase in height, something you couldn't measure with common tools. I wonder if the package marking indicates the revision of the die? I forgot to write mine down when I was installing the heatsink. I didn't even unlock my chip (I think you only need to connect one set of L-1 bridges - the one on the end), so I'm at the default multiplier too. :D
<color=red>Home web site: http://www.bigal-computers.net</color>

<color=blue>Like motorcycles? Check out the WORMS here: http://www.bigal-computers.net/worms.php</color>

Lots of hand-built and modded AMD systems.
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Die Revisions..

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

I read in the Nov. issue of MaxPC that there is a marking either on the box or the die (don't remember and have misplaced the issue) to tell you what revision of the chip you have. SO if you can find the Nov. issue you can find out.. :B eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
Bigal
Senior Member
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 9:00 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Well...

Post by Bigal »

eGoCeNTRoNiX:

I bought mind as an OEM device - no box included (just the anti-static plastic tray). I sure don't want to remove that massive copper heatsink just to see what version I have. Besides, since I got one of the early ones, it must be the revision A. Perhaps cak (I intended my original post for him actually) has written down his codes, or maybe he purchased the boxed CPU? ::
<color=red>Home web site: http://www.bigal-computers.net</color>

<color=blue>Like motorcycles? Check out the WORMS here: http://www.bigal-computers.net/worms.php</color>

Lots of hand-built and modded AMD systems.
Post Reply