P4 or Athlon
- -]Black-Ice9[-
- Genuine Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:59 pm
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
P4 or Athlon
Ok, I know that most of you will say the Athlon just because this is an AMD board, but I was wondering what would be the better setup. I am heavily favoring the P4 @ 2.53 over the Athlon 2200, or the Dual Athlon 2200. The motherboard form intel, the 850E supports the 1gb Rdram Pc1066, and the AMD doesnt.
So what would be the best way to go, if you need more info, then ask me
Thanks
So what would be the best way to go, if you need more info, then ask me
Thanks
AMD

From everything I have seen you get much better performance from an equal AMD cpu and all the parts are usually cheaper too. If you can't decide, what I'd do is write down all the parts you'd need and want for either and then search for prices and then compare. That will help your decision.
Welcome to pca
From everything I have seen you get much better performance from an equal AMD cpu and all the parts are usually cheaper too. If you can't decide, what I'd do is write down all the parts you'd need and want for either and then search for prices and then compare. That will help your decision.
Welcome to pca
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=blade&border=0,0,64&custom=21,138,255&label=79,79,255&header=149,202,255&stats=0,255,255&bgcolor=0,0,181&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="www.Statgfx.com" />
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
- -]Black-Ice9[-
- Genuine Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:59 pm
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
As blade said a lot can change in a year. 
Right now AMD cpus are a better bang for the buck. Although the Northwood Pentium 4's like the P4 1.6a are good if you overclock the hell out of them. <img src="http://www.pcabusers.net/forums/images/icons/evil.gif">

Right now AMD cpus are a better bang for the buck. Although the Northwood Pentium 4's like the P4 1.6a are good if you overclock the hell out of them. <img src="http://www.pcabusers.net/forums/images/icons/evil.gif">
- -]Black-Ice9[-
- Genuine Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:59 pm
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
- -]Black-Ice9[-
- Genuine Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:59 pm
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
- -]Black-Ice9[-
- Genuine Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:59 pm
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
- -]Black-Ice9[-
- Genuine Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:59 pm
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
the hammer is a x86-64 arcitecture and is backwards compatible with any of the 32 bit software out on the market... this is why its gonna be big... not only 64 bit but will still run the 32 bit software without any performance hit at all. unlike the intel Itanium 64 bit chips they are a totally new arcitecture and need software specifically designed for them... They have an emulator that will run 32 bit apps but from what i've read its slower than hell like running a P200