Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
sbp
Posts: 3785 Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:36 am
Contact:
Post
by sbp » Tue May 28, 2002 3:30 pm
1280x960 on a 19" NEC monitor
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868 Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm
Post
by Absolut Talent » Tue May 28, 2002 3:47 pm
I run 1024x768 and I switch between 16bit and 32. (16bit for emulators and 32 for morrowind and other 3d games) all on a 17" monitor
Gone for good. But never say never
chottoED
Almighty Member
Posts: 2340 Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2000 1:00 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:
Post
by chottoED » Tue May 28, 2002 5:14 pm
<sigh>
only 1024x768 for me...
my 15" FP won't take any higher...
As for my 19", I'd love to use it... but I've no desktop space... I guess I need a new desk or something...
<a href="http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/user_summary.php?s=&u=38801" target=_blank><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~techgod723/pics/godaddy.gif"></a>
Sean
Posts: 2360 Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2001 7:33 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD
Contact:
Post
by Sean » Tue May 28, 2002 5:15 pm
1280x960 here.. Native window settings. And, actaully, I made the 3d objects and stuff smaller, I hate having those huge buldging X's, it just pisses me off..
- Sean
Astros_67
Goober Member
Posts: 6 Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:13 pm
Location: Alsip, IL
Contact:
Post
by Astros_67 » Tue May 28, 2002 5:57 pm
1280X1024, and if i could go higher i would. i like haveing a lot of space
bsr
Goober Member
Posts: 10 Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 12:23 am
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:
Post
by bsr » Tue May 28, 2002 11:45 pm
1024 x 768 .. only thing that looks good with my 17" monitor, but I make text bigger so its more comfortable and doesnt give me a head ache trying to read things... LOL
and I use 800 x 600 for games for best game play and faster FPS
Schwartz
Posts: 715 Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:25 pm
Location: Port Allegany, PA
Contact:
Post
by Schwartz » Wed May 29, 2002 12:49 pm
1280x1024 because that's my LCD's native resolution.
Same here.
tunis5000
Almighty Member
Posts: 2296 Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 5:40 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Post
by tunis5000 » Wed May 29, 2002 6:25 pm
chottoED, then why aren't you using the 19" instead of the 15"? What am I missing?
JMan
Golden Member
Posts: 855 Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:02 am
Location: SoCal
Post
by JMan » Wed May 29, 2002 7:17 pm
I believe his desk is too small.
I run 1152x864 because it looks better in Win XP than 1024x768 does. Using a 19" monitor.
JMan
"Have you ever heard of the Emancipation Proclamation?"
"I'm sorry, I don't listen to hip-hop."
Tomuchtime
Senior Member
Posts: 304 Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 6:24 am
Post
by Tomuchtime » Wed May 29, 2002 8:41 pm
1024x768 works good on my cheezy 17"
I'd like to try a flat panel but i don't have space.
Zak33
Senior Member
Posts: 238 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 5:34 pm
Location: Aylesbury, Bucks
Post
by Zak33 » Sat Jun 01, 2002 1:55 am
1024x768x32 at 100hz
Seems to suit my old Hansol 17"er
Its a bit blurry top right corner now, but its old! Like The Queen!
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750 Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:
Post
by Hipnotic_Tranz » Sat Jun 01, 2002 10:59 am
Originally posted by Tomuchtime
I'd like to try a flat panel but i don't have space.
Doesn't a flatpanel take up <i>less</i> space?
Or did you mean you don't have the money, because that I <b>can</b> see!
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif> <i> My get up and go must have got up and went. </i>[/align]
TonyH
Posts: 2510 Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2000 8:20 am
Location: Hippie Watching in the Great Northwest
Post
by TonyH » Sun Jun 02, 2002 12:05 am
1024x768x32 on my 17" Mitsubishi, because my old eyes won't see anything if I go anyhigher.
[align=center]
[/align]