Post your PCMark2002 Scores!

Don_1 · Post by **Don_1** » Tue Apr 16, 2002 10:21 am

here's mine
CPU 4791
Mem 3095
Harddrive 1227
Not great but not tooo bad..

PreDatoR · Post by **PreDatoR** » Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:36 pm

You guys with P4 what are the memory scores with Sandra??? I can't see how your mem scores are that high when you not really pushing the FSB much... Well guess ya kinda are since they are default at 100 but 140 ain't much.

LoneWolfX1X · Post by **LoneWolfX1X** » Tue Apr 16, 2002 8:30 pm

Well my kingmax 2700 is running at 343 cas2 1t command I'd slow timings if I could by my proccessor more or less caps out at 2574 so I'll keep the agressive timings

as for higher results I'd say it's mostly because of the bigger pipe the QDR fsb allows...my FSB is at 572mhz

and while I did own a nice amd setup for awhile I have to say that even given the lower IPC higher clockrates DO have certain advantages....

Sandra: 2783/2846

Lmandrake · Post by **Lmandrake** » Tue Apr 16, 2002 11:11 pm

Shuttle AK35GTR, XP 2000+ @1800 (144 FSB) Maxtor 40 GB in non-raid, 256mb Crucial PC2100 (that will only run at this FSB with conservative timings) Voodoo 5 5000 (until I break down and buy a GF4 Ti)

MAC · Post by **MAC** » Wed Apr 17, 2002 7:21 pm

Originally posted by PreDatoR
You guys with P4 what are the memory scores with Sandra??? I can't see how your mem scores are that high when you not really pushing the FSB much... Well guess ya kinda are since they are default at 100 but 140 ain't much.

Just ran Sandra and the results were:

RAM INT BUFFERED iSSE2 BANDWIDTH - 2044 MB/s
RAM FLOAT BUFFERED iSSE BANDWIDTH - 2052 MB/s

MAC

PreDatoR · Post by **PreDatoR** » Wed Apr 17, 2002 7:27 pm

PCMARK2002 must bench with the L2 cache and all the other goodies... Cause those sandra scores are just like the score for my board.

wvjohn · Post by **wvjohn** » Fri Apr 19, 2002 8:54 pm

msi 645 ultra
p4 1.6a
256 mb ocz pc3200
39 C

everything a t default

sandra

cpu
alu 2860
fpu 835/1962

memory

sse2 2319
buff 2320

pcmark 2002

3936 cpu
4575 mem
775 hd

1st and only overclock attempt

1.6a @ 2.4 @ 1.5v @stock cooling w/2500 rpm fan

150 fsb - have no idea what the other meomory settings are - probably bios default
all i did was dial up the fsb
43 C

cpu
alu 4682
fpu 1248/2918

mem
buff 2831
ub 2830

pcmark 2002

5868
5929
790

i am totally impressed so far with this setup. A 50% overclock by simply turning up the dial. and this puppy is fast!

Mike89 · Post by **Mike89** » Sun Apr 21, 2002 1:28 pm

4874
3014
475

By comparing to other scores here, I am really disappointed in my scores.

AMD 2000+
512 megs Crucial DDR (2 256s)
DFI AK76-SN motherboard (761/Via chipset)
GeForce 4600
WD 7200 rpm 20.5 gig (ATA 66) (on 80 wire, IDE 1, Master)
WD 5400 rpm 13 gig (ATA 66) (on same 80 wire, IDE 1, Slave)
Antec 400 Power Supply
Windows XP Pro

My HDD's have notoriously always scored low in any kind of tests I have ran. I must have just got 2 really slow ones. My system seems fast to me but I always seem to score lower than other comparable systems.

PreDatoR · Post by **PreDatoR** » Sun Apr 21, 2002 2:08 pm

Your hard drives are ATA66 so of course they'll score lower.. Mine is ATA133 but its only running ata100 speed cause winxp for some reason won't run it in Mode 6

poop · Post by **poop** » Sun Apr 21, 2002 3:55 pm

ATA133/100/66 shouldn't make a difference, should it? I mean, no ATA hard drive can sustain more than 50 MBps (passed emptying its cache). So unless PCMark is poorly designed, the difference between 133/100/66 should be minimal.

PreDatoR · Post by **PreDatoR** » Sun Apr 21, 2002 4:12 pm

ata133/100/66/33 is bandwidth... My drive scores 97Mbps bandwidth with HD Tach and its a ATA/133 drive but only running ata/100. Yeah bandwidth is gonna make a difference... Does more bandwidth on your ISP mean you transfer more data... Yes it does.

poop · Post by **poop** » Mon Apr 22, 2002 6:16 am

Sure, you have more bandwidth, but your ISP analogy is flawed.

Imagine you have a cable modem connection to your ISP. Nice bandwitdh, eh? But what if the ISP is only capable of 56 kbps speeds on their end? Your bandwidth is wasted, except on bursts from the ISP router. ATA drive performance is the same. What good is all that bandwidth if you cannot use it, except on very short bursts?

PreDatoR · Post by **PreDatoR** » Mon Apr 22, 2002 7:33 am

Argue all you want... But why is it i notice a hell of a speed increase in my hard drive performance if i change it from mode3 to mode 6 explain that... I guess its just all in my imagination... Its still gonna make a difference speed wise no matter how you look at it so YES it will affect the PCMark scores.

poop · Post by **poop** » Mon Apr 22, 2002 7:43 am

I agree with you that it makes a difference in PCMark. I just think the benchmark is broken, that's all.

If switching from ATA133 to ATA100 gives you lower benchmark results, the benchmark is not performing tests representative of the real world. Find a more established, mature benchmark and then see if the 133-->100 switch greatly affects results. It shouldn't.

I assume the disk benchmark will be fixed in later versions of PCMark.

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Fri Apr 26, 2002 5:53 pm

my first one:

http://service.madonion.com/servlet/Ind ... tId=253256

CPU: 3177
Memory: 2190
HDD: 869

Not bad..

I am going to get some high FSB in a little while, after the ASII matures. I want to see if I can get to at least 145-150 FSB. I'm at 133. Than play with some ram timings.

What would be the best settings for two Crucial PC2100 DDR Sticks?

Thanks!

PCA Forums

Post your PCMark2002 Scores!

ok gang, here's a little 1.6A lovin