can U still trash hdd at high fsb's

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
Chris.U.K
Senior Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:07 am
Location: UK. Sheffield
Contact:

can U still trash hdd at high fsb's

Post by Chris.U.K »

Been fiddling with 3 pc's. This one has the older Fujitsu 17gig hdd UDMA 66 inside. For a few weeks i have been trying a few cpu,mobo combos and o\clocking them etc.
I just settled down with my msi mobo and XP1700. Got things up and running ok, till my hdd gets several bad sectors. Like i said i had been playing around with diff. combos and diff. hdd's. I only left this udma 66 inside cos it was already win98se and had some files m wanted.

So i have been running my system at 140-158FSB, 158 being the latter. when i shut down and started win one day scandisk told me i had damaged info. got into windows ran scandisk in thorough mode. did not count the bad sectors but it seems to be around 40-60 of them.


I thought newer hdd's were alot safer these days.

can drop down to pio mode 4 which is no prob. rather have a faster cpu/mem than hdd.

Chris.
AMD or Intel wont stop me but the laws of physics might. slowly on the mend.
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

First of all Futjistu drives are JUNK (my opinion, but ask around - there's a reason why they're so cheap and have the shortest warranty period in the business). I wouldn't use one for a doorstop, and I certainly wouldn't trust important data on it. In the IT business I've seen these drives fail FAR too often.

Being that Fujitsu drives are cheap junk to begin with, I would be very concerned about running one on an off frequency PCI bus.

Yes, drives are still sensitive to PCI bus speeds. It's not the overclock per-se, it's the fact that some drives and controllers are touchy about the PCI bus clock speed. Even an underclocked PCI bus can cause problems.

It's a trial and error thing, and you also need to rely on reviews from others using the same hardware.

The the hardware COMBINATION might be more important that the individual hardware. I had an ABit BE6-II who's onboard UDMA controller would fail to initialize the boot drive during POST if the PCI bus was more than 5 Mhz off frequency. However this only happened with a WDC 30Gb drive. A 30Gb Maxtor worked fine. I switched to an IWill UDMA controller card on the same mobo and it worked fine with either drive.

It's rather silly to drop to PIO mode 4, but that's a personal call. Why would you want to criple the speed of your drive sub-system so dramatically (and switching from UDMA to PIO4 is a BIG performance difference).

To be honest with you I'd do a little research online and find out what hard drives are good for overclocking and sell that Fujitsu POS drive (or just keep it as a spare). You should also research how fussy your onboard controller is to overclocking as well. You should check the overclocking forum here an some of the overclocking sites like:

http://overclockers.com
http://www.tweakmax.com/

Be aware you're pushing your system WAY beyond spec by going as high as 158 and it might be a number of stability issues causing your problem. Could be your drive and controller are fine but at that speed you're getting an occasional corrupt data transfer across the I/O bus that's scrambling your drive.

Overclocking is inherently risky and you may just be pushing your luck at 158. Try backing off a bit.

Hope this helps...
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
rogue
Golden Member
Posts: 872
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2000 10:40 pm
Location: Shore of Orion
Contact:

Post by rogue »

IBM HD's are notorious for being bitchy at anything past 150 fsb. I recommend maxtor or seagate, but definitely get rid of that Fujitsu.
Welcome to the machine.
Chris.U.K
Senior Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:07 am
Location: UK. Sheffield
Contact:

Post by Chris.U.K »

Seems fujitsu sux. Dam i have 2 of them one a udma100. I got a maxtor 40gig udma 100 which i will put in this rig.

Thanx u guys

Chris.
AMD or Intel wont stop me but the laws of physics might. slowly on the mend.
PreDatoR
Life Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:01 pm

Post by PreDatoR »

I know for a fact that IBM are shit past 150...lol At 155 it fubared the drive bad sectors and the works my other comp when i slaved it in wouldn't even boot into windows... IBM's drive utility erased it and hid the bad sectors then 3 days later it did it again this time at 133 needless to say that drive got sent back to ibm and once i get a new one back.... Its gettin' sold... Get a maxtor this one in my comp now don't have any trouble with higher FSB.
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Good luck with Maxtor here as well.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

I messed up Installs when pusing the fsb a bit to much but never Killing a drive. man that would suck. I had bought a 60g maxtor the otherday and there was um a Quantom in the bo...I understand they own them but that ant right.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
Post Reply