Funny question...

Discussions and help regarding overclocking, motherboards, peripherals, AMD and INTEL CPU's
Post Reply
User avatar
cjinx
Senior Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 3:39 pm
Location: Bremerton, Wa.

Post by cjinx »

What's after a Ghz? I mean, when I turn 65 sitting in front of my computer (if that's what we have by then) and the frequency turns .99 ghz, what's next? Anyone??
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

I am not sure but if I remember right it is a google and no I am not kidding just not sure.
Image
User avatar
ketchup
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 10:05 pm
Location: GA
Contact:

Post by ketchup »

that would be Tgz - Tera hertz

I dont think it will happen in our life time though :(

Could you imagine 799 billion transistors on a .02 micron die, lol
Pricewatch | Heatware | System | Just Above the Spectrum
____________________________
-- I'm the one that made caffeine have dreams of chaotic scenes in split screen --
User avatar
cjinx
Senior Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 3:39 pm
Location: Bremerton, Wa.

Post by cjinx »

I think we will see it in our lifetime. We went from 486-1.3ghz in only what, 10 years or so? Now chip manufacturers are giving us 100mhz increments every month it seems. With technology advancing that rapidly, I think we'll see the "terahertz" barrier before us young puppies are pushing up daisies....Later
User avatar
ketchup
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 10:05 pm
Location: GA
Contact:

Post by ketchup »

I still say it wont happen for a couple of reasons

like all other technology things pan off once the max is achieved and everything else after that is really extras - e.g. humans can only hear 16bit 44.1khz, yet companies still make 24bit and 32bit equipment, why? unless you are some audiophile, you cant really hear the difference between 16bit, 24bit and 32bit audio - theres no real need for it.

right now there is no real driving force for computing except for 3D applications, games, intensive number crunching.
a person using MS word on PIII 450, would react the same on a P4 1.3. to that person, there is no need for the extra horse power.

the same will eventually happen to video cards in a decade or so, once someone developes a 3d engine/video card capable of complete effect of realism in all aspects and becomes the standard, what would be the goal after? kit it with HDTV GTS Ultra with MTM ver2.4(mental telepathy modules) built in, lol

'Computer! Get me a beer!' Damn, still doesnt work :)
Pricewatch | Heatware | System | Just Above the Spectrum
____________________________
-- I'm the one that made caffeine have dreams of chaotic scenes in split screen --
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

im hoping the cpu speed doesnt go all thta much higher and they start working o nthe other slow ass things in the puter. I mean comon a 33mhz bus? ZZZZZZZZZZ

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
ketchup
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 10:05 pm
Location: GA
Contact:

Post by ketchup »

true, i would love to see TFSB - True Full Speed Bus

Imagine that, I start an application and nothing gets bottlenecked


'Computer, Get me a beer' Damn! It still doesnt work :)
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

I can definitly imagine it happening, but new technologoy which will be superior to the CPU will come out or some sh*t. I don't think we'll ever reach it for that one reason; something new and better will come out which will make todays CPU a lost idea.
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
Ladies Man
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 1:35 pm
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Post by Ladies Man »

we won't get that high

people will realize that that high speed number isn't everything

a 100mhz computer could beat a 1.5 ghz computer.
If you run more stuff per clock cycle and all that good stuff cpus would be better... but the lower the stuff per cycle to get that nice big number.

As we all know 5 nickles is better than 1 dollar... cus 5 is more than 1.
I've been through the desert on a horse with no name
It felt good to be out of the rain
In the desert you can remember your name
'Cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain
La, la ...
User avatar
vwkess
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:57 am
Location: NWA

Post by vwkess »

I also think we won't see it. Fiber optic or organic technolgies will have progressed enough before we see tHz cpu's.
Speck102
Senior Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 5:24 pm
Location: West Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post by Speck102 »

If they do stick to making cpu's, which is likely since they have been for like 30 or more years, then in about 20years or less we will see those chips. To achieve the effect of total reallity, they might just need a thz pc, maybe not, but i think it will.
Post Reply