King Kong

FanTum · Post by **FanTum** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:01 pm

Holy crap what a sweet friggin movie!!!!!!

Great effects and action!!!!!!

There was at least 45min of not stop action in one sequence. Got to see it at the big screen!

Augix · Post by **Augix** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:02 am

I dont think it was that great! I saw the 80's version of the movie and basically is the same, the first part was long. very long almost 50 min. of nothing. The island part was great! and Jack Black do a good job. then back to the city hmmmmm! I Will say this movie was like a 6.7 I partially agree with the effects some werent so great anyway this movie will be a nice rental, but nothing beyond that. (at least for me) I saw people leaving from the theater after 2 hs... and the movie is almost 3hs! too long pal for a movie plotless/

hame

renovation · Post by **renovation** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:07 am

i think a big screen was a must for this movie - i just don't think a TV will do the movies special effects justice . the movies tribal scenes were very well done by the make up artist's . they sure had me saying im sure glad i didn't have to confront them even in a lighted room !i think i would crap my pants

nexus_7 · Post by **nexus_7** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:04 pm

yea. the island was ok, the reast was just junk!

Greg

FanTum · Post by **FanTum** » Sun Dec 25, 2005 11:07 pm

I agree with the story line and the beginning but gotta go with the great action!

wvjohn · Post by **wvjohn** » Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:12 am

I saw th elast hour and th eisland stuff was cool, but I already knew how it ended....my favorite is still in the original uncut version where everyone was wearing underwear made out of coconuts.......

Executioner · Post by **Executioner** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:57 am

Finally saw King Kong tonight, and Peter Jackson has another masterpiece. What an outstanding job he did. This flick had it all: action, romance, adventure, and love. As for the Island part, talk about total action non-stop. The special effects were excellent, and I compare them to Lord of the Rings but even better. I thought Spielberg was good, but Jackson IMHO has taken over as the action director. For those that have not seen this flick, see it before it leaves the theater. Out of 10 stars, I give this movie a 9.

Shmithers · Post by **Shmithers** » Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:11 pm

I just bought this movie last friday (after seeing it in the theaters) Thought it was a very impressive even though it was very long. I really like longer movies, espictaly if I have lots of time to kill.
Yay for Peter Jackson, and I hope his directing in "Halo: The Movie" will be just as good.