Cold Air Intake vs Short Ram Intake???

This car is systematic, hyyydromatic...why it's greased lightning!
Post Reply
User avatar
fearfox
Golden Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 9:58 am
Location: Los Angeles California
Contact:

Cold Air Intake vs Short Ram Intake???

Post by fearfox »

looking at the both options but not sure what are the pros and cons of each???? Is there any brand that gives u better results for both, or it doesnt matter?????
<img src="http://realtreasures.com/augix/fearfox44.jpg" width="319" height="77"><p style="margin-top: -1">
<a href="http://www.joinarnold.com" target="_top"> <img src="http://www.joinarnold.com/images/banners/ja120.gif" border="0" width="120" height="60"> </a>
User avatar
Viperoni
Almighty Member
Posts: 2120
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 7:26 am
Location: Brampton, ON, Canada
Contact:

Post by Viperoni »

SRI's have a very short distance between the throttle body or MAF and the filter; good for wet/winter because there's less chance of sucking up water. It does pull in warm air from the engine bay though.

CAI, as you may have guessed, is typically a lot longer and positioned so that it grabs cold air from somewhere, usually down low.
Main rig: Intel e2140 @ 3.0ghz, Asus P5K-E, 2x1gb Kingmax 1066mhz, 36gb 15k Fujitsu MAU, 500gb Maxline Pro,
250gb WD SE, Sapphire X1950GT 256mb, Pioneer DVR-111D, Pioneer DVR-107D, Antec TP v2.0 480w, Inwin q500n.

1995 Saturn SW2 - 15.3 @ 90mph:
http://www.sounddomain.com/ride/2346787/
D1GP
Goober Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 4:02 am

Post by D1GP »

SRI - great for low to midrange power, since it's by the engine, the air you suck in will be hot
CAI - great for mid to high end power, positions filter closer to bottom of car which runs the risk of sucking in water or dirt (aem makes a cheap bypass valve to fix any accidental ingestion of water)

imo, dont waste your money on any intake over 100 bux, you can make a decent one for cheap, I cant justify dishing out 300 bux for the "name brand" ones.
Post Reply