We are gonna get some traffic in here! There is only 1 way...

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
User avatar
Red Dawn
Golden Member
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 3:44 am
Location: Everett MA/Boston

Post by Red Dawn »

I have no loyalty to Hardware Companies. Which ever CPU,Motherboard or Video card gives me grief I hate :)


The P4 is more or less a Prototype. I'm sure within a year it will be a contender for the actual speed crown. By then they will be using a different chipset that will support DDR instead of Rambus. Hopefully the competition between AMD and Chipzilla will continue to keep prices down.

Meanwhile I'll keep on enjoying my new AMD CPU's
Ich bin ein PC Mißbrauch
User avatar
Reg Kmet
Golden Member
Posts: 1693
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 4:02 am
Location: Gimli, Manitoba
Contact:

Post by Reg Kmet »

i guess it's a question of if you actulaay need all that speed, i mean when will games come out that require like an 800 mhz cpu??
Darkheart
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:11 am
Location: West Yorkshire UK

Post by Darkheart »

Don't they already require an 800Mhz CPU...?

I need no more convincing, I've been running AMD Athlon's since launch and never gone back...

Dakrheart
User avatar
CaterpillarAssassin
Almighty Member
Posts: 2252
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:29 am
Location: somewhere in N.E

Post by CaterpillarAssassin »

ibm viavoice requires 600mhz...
Image
Coco
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:55 am
Location: Canada

Post by Coco »

Actually, some games do...

According to "No one lives forever"(Extremely stupid game BTW). Require P3-750, 64MB video card for highest details.

But the thing is... Intel and RAMBUS sucks!!!

Wahahahahahaha............. :D

I really hope RAMBUS will just die and go to hell. Give us DDR damn it!

[Edited by Coco on 11-23-2000 at 07:56 PM]
kitner
Goober Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:59 am
Location: Down Under

Post by kitner »

Via Cyrix 550 Mhz...... :)
User avatar
JMan
Golden Member
Posts: 855
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:02 am
Location: SoCal

NOLF

Post by JMan »

NOLF is a pretty cool game (minus some really stupid things). I can run the highest quality @ 1024x768x32, 32 bit, and I only have a TNT2. It looks just fine. I'm not sure why they recommend a 750 Mhz/256 MB/64 Video Ram setup.
And on topic, my next rig will likely be AMD.

JMan
"Have you ever heard of the Emancipation Proclamation?"
"I'm sorry, I don't listen to hip-hop."
User avatar
sheerdark
Senior Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 7:43 pm
Contact:

Post by sheerdark »

I would go with AMD any day of the week. Now, a year ago...I would have said Intel all the way, however times have changed and AMD kicks @$$. I mean....what would you choose a puter with a 200mhz bus...or one with a measly 100 to 133mhz bus? The numbers speak for themselves. The P!!! just can not touch the Athalon. Just my .02 cents.
Coco
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:55 am
Location: Canada

Post by Coco »

It seems that everyone is going for AMD... Do you think Intel is in the same position that 3dfx was in a few years ago? Like ignoring what people want and go for whatever they want coz they are the king?
User avatar
sbp
Posts: 3785
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:36 am
Contact:

Post by sbp »

Yes Intel has been trying to get its way no matter what the industry and customers want. Intel has new products out there and in development that they will be competing with and crank up the speeds on. In short Intel has a gameplan unlike 3dfx 2 years ago. Intel is still making money, has plenty of money in the bank and will be in no danger of being bought by a competitor (or going bankrupted whichever comes first for 3dfsucks}. Bottom line is Intel is still going to be making cpu's 2 years from now. Will 3dfx be making videocards in 2 years? Doubtful. Also AMD and the other cpu makers are in no position to supply the market with all the cpu's it needs. So while Intel is arrogant they are in a much better position than 3dfx ever was.

[Edited by sbp on 12-01-2000 at 07:30 AM]
Post Reply