RAM latencies

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
PHILO67
Genuine Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:54 am
Location: waynesville nc

RAM latencies

Post by PHILO67 »

looking to get more ram and i think my latency is 2.5-3-3-8 how important is it to get the exact same numbers
AMD Athlon XP 2700+ OC'D to 2.275 GHz reads 2800+
SAPHIRE RADEON 9200 SE
Realtek AC'97 Audio 6.1ch
256mg ddr400 kingston ram at 333
3gig ddr333 max
Gigabyte GA-7VT600 MB
Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP-1
WD 60gig HD
Hitachi 52xcd/dvd
ASUS 52X32X52 CD-RW
User avatar
wpublic
Senior Member
Posts: 350
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 6:07 am
Location: nashville, tn

Post by wpublic »

if you are overclocking and/or running dual channel, it is gonna be better if the ram runs at the same latencies. if you do want to run 2 modules for this purpose, matching pairs or twin modules are the best.

most boards nowadays, you can change the latencies, but if you don't know what a ram module can run, it is like rolling the dice. the important thing to look for is at what speed those latencies run. if you are buying higher end ram for overclocking, they will (or should) advertise what the module has been tested to run at and at what speed.

I have PC4000 that runs at 2-4-4-7 by SPD until i change the FSB to 232, then it changes to 2-5-5-9. When i change FSB to 250 (haven't got there yet ) it will change to 2.5-5-5-9 . It has been tested to run at 250, which is why it can be called a PC4000. Those timings are programmed into the module as SPD.

I could go in bios anytime and change those, but it for me is rolling the dice. I only change timings if i am overclocking and can't get it to run high FSB, and i suspect the ram to be the culprit.

You can look at the timings thru cpu-z 1.24, it will show you what the SPD timings are, and what it is running right now.

all that said, if you are not overclocking, you should still try to get as close as you can to the same. most ram modules will still advertise the CAS latency, if yours has 2.5, then you should try and match at least that with the same speed module (pc2700,pc3200,etc.) if you have a good board, it will usually be able to handle slight differences without a big hit in performance.
User avatar
PHILO67
Genuine Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:54 am
Location: waynesville nc

Post by PHILO67 »

thank you i am capable of dual channel any diff in performance im looking for 2x512 and my stick now is 256 kingston will mixing brands work or will i have to remove kingston i have 3 dimms im looking into ocz or ocs not sure which one or maybe some mushkin any suggestions :D
AMD Athlon XP 2700+ OC'D to 2.275 GHz reads 2800+
SAPHIRE RADEON 9200 SE
Realtek AC'97 Audio 6.1ch
256mg ddr400 kingston ram at 333
3gig ddr333 max
Gigabyte GA-7VT600 MB
Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP-1
WD 60gig HD
Hitachi 52xcd/dvd
ASUS 52X32X52 CD-RW
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7512
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

Anything but OCZ.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
User avatar
PHILO67
Genuine Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:54 am
Location: waynesville nc

Post by PHILO67 »

maybe i should just stick with the big K you know its been fine for me but im pretty sure its a low end dimm (no heatspreader) any good recomendations on some kingston that wont break me 2x512
AMD Athlon XP 2700+ OC'D to 2.275 GHz reads 2800+
SAPHIRE RADEON 9200 SE
Realtek AC'97 Audio 6.1ch
256mg ddr400 kingston ram at 333
3gig ddr333 max
Gigabyte GA-7VT600 MB
Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP-1
WD 60gig HD
Hitachi 52xcd/dvd
ASUS 52X32X52 CD-RW
Post Reply