I recently overclocked my 3.0C which was at 3.6 to 3.8 because of some new RAM I picked up. Originally at 3600Mhz I would get a horrendous Super pi score of 41 seconds with most processes disabled and super_pi.exe priority set to realtime. At 3800MHz I could run Super pi again and various other benchmarks and got the score to 39 seconds. This is very slow for a 3.6 and a 3.8. Since the system crashed with 2xPrime95 at 3800MHz, 3750MHz, and 3700MHz and wouldn't boot with 1.625Vcore, I am currently testing back at a stable 3,6GHz. Anyone know why the 3.6 is performing so poorly?
Here are Zeitgeist 2004.6's specs:
3.0C @ 3.6; Vcore 1.575
Asus P4P800 Deluxe
2x512 MB Kingston HyperX PC4000 @ 240 FSB running 1:1
ThermalTake 480W Butterfly w/ Active PFC
SP-94 w/ ThermalTake 92mm smart case fan
I originally had some HardcoreCooling.com generic cas 2.0 PC3200 (2x512 MB) running 5:4. I thought this was the root of my performance shortcomings, but apparently not. What could it be?
Thanks in advance,
daba
3.0C @ 3.6/3.8 slow?
I'm currently at 240 FSB with no problems. I read that PAT didn't really matter. If enabling PAT allows me to run over 240 FSB, I have direct proof that such is not the case. My friend's 2,4 @ 3,4 has 283 FSB on the same P4P800 deluxe.
I should add that RAM did play a crucial role in this situation. Back when I had PC3200 I could not run any program above 3,6 GHz. With this PC4000 not only can I get into XP at 3,8 GHz, I can also run various benchmarking software (but it doesn't survive dual prime).
I should add that RAM did play a crucial role in this situation. Back when I had PC3200 I could not run any program above 3,6 GHz. With this PC4000 not only can I get into XP at 3,8 GHz, I can also run various benchmarking software (but it doesn't survive dual prime).