PCA Forums

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2004 5:06 pm**

i am torn between a couple settings now

220X10 at 2,3,3,6
210x10.5 at 2,2,2,5
215x 10 at 2,3,2,6

i would like to stay within these three because i can keep my default 1.65 vcore
i ran prime and my temps went all the way up to 58 load after hours on all these settings

the only thing i see a difference in is 3dmark 2001
which is plus + or minus a few 100
of course the 200 scores the highest on 3dmark

so which one is better or does it even matter?

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2004 5:21 pm**

Ive mamaged to get the stePpin off the chip as well
i have no idea what these numbers mean

AXDA2500KV4D
AQUCA0309TPDW

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2004 5:40 pm**

Those setting are so close I doubt you will be able to see a real world difference but if it were me I would go with the 220 x 10 setting.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2004 6:09 pm**

yeah and to be honest
i dont even a notice a difference between cas 2 and 2.5

these computers are just stupid number games, that everybody is playing

any clue on the barton?
i remember i bought it when it first came out so i was hopin i had a "special" one but oh well

PCA Forums

which cpu setting is better?

which cpu setting is better?