Takin' the P4 Plunge

Discussions and help regarding overclocking, motherboards, peripherals, AMD and INTEL CPU's
Post Reply
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Takin' the P4 Plunge

Post by wvjohn »

having skipped the AMD XP cycle and the P4 256K cycle, I ordered a 1.6A and an MSI Ultra SIS 645 mobo. We'll see how it compares. Most sites report at least 2.2 out of this combo. NewEgg says it's on the truck :)
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Post by wvjohn »

mobo and cpu arrived today - got the good sl668 malay bo stepping - overclockers reports that the average oc on these is to 2351

the cpu is tiny - 2/3 size of amd and the hs/f is huge - bigger than anything i have for amd - it also attaches with two levers - center it and close the levers and it's on....sounds too simple...where's the part where you get out your popsicle sticks and screwdrivers? how can you install a heatsink without bleeding on the mobo....more details letter....i ordered a 400w ps but i guess i'll have to pull out the mobo in my case with the 350w which is p4 compatible for the time being -
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
User avatar
FuNPoLiCe001
Posts: 987
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 4:57 pm
Location: T dot O dot
Contact:

Post by FuNPoLiCe001 »

i love those intel retail HSF's

easy as pie to put on and u dont freak when doing it...unlike all those AMD ones

is it alot quieter?
Let Cam, take care of your breasts
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Post by wvjohn »

it is a 2500 rpm 80mm fan :) and you're right, all you have to do is flip the levers and it is on. bout time someone designed something rational - the hdd is louder than the fan

got it up and running tonight, just the usual glitches

for fun i thought i'd start with a 150 fsb overclock (1.6 > 2.4)

upped the cpu voltage to 1.5 and dialed up the fsb

booted without a hitch - i am seriously impressed with this rig - as far as i know the memory settings are all default - haven't even looked at them yet


2.4 from a 133$ cpu and an $80 mobo and a $90 stick of ram is gooooood value in my book

it was also neat that i didn't have to load any 4/1 drivers

the mobo has a web based flash utility, so you just log onto the website and push the button to upgrade the bios

i'm doing an article on this build and i'll fill in the details then
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

I had a board with that once...and the web update killed it. :(

GReg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
VidmanII
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:54 pm
Location: Egg Harbor, NJ

Post by VidmanII »

I'm skipping the Insmell Northwood cycle and waiting for the <b>AMD Hammer </b>. :) Even at 2.0+ GHz, the IPC of the Intel chips is pretty weak. Whatever turns you on tho, as this is just my opinion. :D
AMD Ph II X4 955 BE 3.2 @ 3.8 GHz | Scythe SCSMZ-2000 | ASRock 880GMH/USB3 | 8 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 | Radeon HD5670 | Kingston 128GB SSD
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Post by wvjohn »

started running video benches and it wasn't stable on 3dmark - i turned down the fsb to 133 and it worked fine so far - haven't really had the time to play with the memory settings - the cpu obviously has a lot of overhead - 3dmark scores withan 8500 default were in the 89xx range - hopefully this week i will have some time to fool with it - cutting grass and soccer games interferes with "technical research" :)
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
Post Reply