Is Nvidia making the same mistake as 3dfx?
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:24 am
If you "old as I am" gamers remember, it seemed that 3dfx was resting on their laurels when Nvidia overtook them. 3dfx was the king baby, the coolest games had 3dfx support, and things were good. Then it seems that Nvida creeped in, being more responsive to users, adding more features, ect. Then there was a hot debate on which was better 3dfx or nvidia, graphics or speed. Then, bang, one day 3dfx is no more and Nvidia is the king.
Today, the hot debate is ATI vs Nvida. It seems that maybe Nvidia was sleeping or did not think that ATI was a contender. Nvidia has better dx8 scores? Ati better dx9? Speed vs Graphics again? Will nvidia go the way of 3dfx? Thanks to Nexus's poll, it seems that fully 45% of pcabusers are using ATI. Hmmm....
Today, the hot debate is ATI vs Nvida. It seems that maybe Nvidia was sleeping or did not think that ATI was a contender. Nvidia has better dx8 scores? Ati better dx9? Speed vs Graphics again? Will nvidia go the way of 3dfx? Thanks to Nexus's poll, it seems that fully 45% of pcabusers are using ATI. Hmmm....