10/100/1000?

Networking and broadband talkabout. Need help with that new router or setting up a network?
Post Reply
blade
Posts: 9113
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 1:56 am
Location: LV-426
Contact:

10/100/1000?

Post by blade »

I'm seeing some newer ethernet pci adapters saying 10/100 and 1000, is that suppose to give faster speeds or what?

For example:
http://www.dealsonic.com/sycrioviach1.html

thanks
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=blade&border=0,0,64&custom=21,138,255&label=79,79,255&header=149,202,255&stats=0,255,255&bgcolor=0,0,181&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="www.Statgfx.com" />
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

To my knowledge the only thing the gig connections is good for at this point is if you have two machine talking over a network and both have a gig NIC in them. Dont look for faster speed from you cable modem etc because you have a gig Ethernet card connecting to it though.
Image
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Yep..

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

You also have to have a Gigabit switch as well.

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Gigabit has no practical value for a home user unless you're transfering large files (like video files). I swapped out my house network switch for a gigabit switch and am using a Gigabit NIC in my file server and workstation because I do a lot of video editing and store the files on the server.

In a small office LAN unless you're transferring large files you usually only want the server on a gigabit port on the router, and all other workstations on 100 Mbit ports so no one hogs the bandwidth to the server.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
TruckStuff
Golden Member
Posts: 1056
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by TruckStuff »

What FP said. If you're frequently transferring large files ("large" >= 500Mb), gigabit ethernet (GbE) is worth it just in time savings. There *is* a pretty signifigant performance different between 10/100 and GbE, but if you're not doing lots of file transfers, it isn't worth the price for most folks.
blade
Posts: 9113
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 1:56 am
Location: LV-426
Contact:

Post by blade »

Thank you very much guys. :chug
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=blade&border=0,0,64&custom=21,138,255&label=79,79,255&header=149,202,255&stats=0,255,255&bgcolor=0,0,181&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="www.Statgfx.com" />
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
User avatar
DoPeY5007
Almighty Member
Posts: 4259
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 5:50 pm
Location: Moved to the hood, a few blocks from USC
Contact:

Post by DoPeY5007 »

Originally posted by FlyingPenguin


In a small office LAN unless you're transferring large files you usually only want the server on a gigabit port on the router, and all other workstations on 100 Mbit ports so no one hogs the bandwidth to the server.
That is how my company does the network, except the server is on 100 and all the workstations are stuck on 10 :rolleyes:
Image Image Image

"I'm seriously going to pummel you until you purr like a bitch-kitten!!"
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7512
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

Originally posted by DoPeY5007
That is how my company does the network, except the server is on 100 and all the workstations are stuck on 10 :rolleyes:


Ditto... but im working on getting it all up to gig backbone and 100 everywhere and gig to the servers... but it isnt something that will happen over night.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
User avatar
ZYFER
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida

Post by ZYFER »

secondary benefit would be relating to heavy LAN gaming, which most people just don't do :) it really isn't worth the investment in my opinion.
User avatar
DoPeY5007
Almighty Member
Posts: 4259
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 5:50 pm
Location: Moved to the hood, a few blocks from USC
Contact:

Post by DoPeY5007 »

what LAN game can benifit from GigE?


I never heard of any that could
Image Image Image

"I'm seriously going to pummel you until you purr like a bitch-kitten!!"
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Well not gaming. You don't need gigabit for gaming. But as we all know a fair amount of file swapping occurs at LANs and Gigabit greatly helps there.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
DoPeY5007
Almighty Member
Posts: 4259
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 5:50 pm
Location: Moved to the hood, a few blocks from USC
Contact:

Post by DoPeY5007 »

well, yeah, you don't want the leechers to bring up your ping time :p
Image Image Image

"I'm seriously going to pummel you until you purr like a bitch-kitten!!"
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7512
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

yea thats how we run LOTL.. dual gig between the banks of tables all going back up to a gig switch.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
Post Reply