passive firewall?

Networking and broadband talkabout. Need help with that new router or setting up a network?
Post Reply
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

passive firewall?

Post by TheSovereign »

hey guys need a quick favor does anyone know of a product that is a passive firewall

meaning it doesnt have to be the local gateway to do its job filtering
i have a company that wishes to continue using their software filter but they want firewall protection and i wanna do it right not have 2 nat servers working on 1 connect

anyone know of anything?
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

There's nothing wrong with "stacking" NAT routers. I do it all the time. Nowadays most of your DSL ISPs give you a modem/router and not just a bridged modem. If you need to have a router after it then you have two choices: stack the routers (which does make port forwarding a little bit more complicated - you need to forward all ports fro mthe first to the 2nd router and then forward from the 2nd router to the specific PC) or ask the ISP how to reconfigure the modem as a "bridged" modem (disabling the modem's NAT router) so you're directly exposed on your public IP address.

While I have stacked routers, I do like to use a bridged DSL connection around here because Sprint's routers (the only DSL ISP in town) doesn't stealth all it's ports. Any decent off-the shelf $50 router nowadays stealths all it's ports so I'd rather have my router sitting on the public IP. Not so important maybe, but it might invite extra traffic from port scanners which could bog down the connection.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

i guess its the purist in me, but stacking nat to me is very bad ive seen some issues with SSL over natx2
and these are corporate connections

professional all the way i dont care if the firewall costs 5k
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Well is there any reason you can't eliminate the existing NAT router?
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

web filtering software lol
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
ZYFER
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida

Post by ZYFER »

It seems like the Penguin there has the best suggestion short of getting a whole new router which does everything you need, something I am sure the company wouldn't want to do.
When all else fails, replace the user.
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

So if I understand there's web filtering software on their existing router they want to keep?

You might look into the Astaro Security Appliance. They're all supposed to be gateways (NAT routers) though, but they're sophisticated enough that you might be able to use them as a firewall only.

http://www.astaro.com/products/security_appliances

You can also download a free linux distro of their gateway software an run it on on an old PC. I haven't tried it yet but it's supposed to be good.

I honestly don't think anyone makes a straight firewall without a NAT router anymore. Part of the function of modern firewalling is to reject unsolicted incoming traffic, and there is no better way to do that than with a NAT router.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
Post Reply