Pretty Pretty - Pricey Pricey Intel's six-pack

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Pretty Pretty - Pricey Pricey Intel's six-pack

Post by wvjohn »

Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition Gulftown 3.33GHz 12MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor - Retail
This item can only be purchased with combo(limit 1 per customer) what's this?


a mere $1,099.99 at newegg.
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
theophilusmousse
Senior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:36 am
Location: Valpo

Post by theophilusmousse »

thats a better deal than some intel chips.... only $183 per core ... heh heh
Run, run, run, as fast as you can...
you can't catch me, I'm the Stinky Cheese Man.
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Intel's top end has always been stupid expensive. It's one of those things where you just buy an entire computer to absorb the cost.
User avatar
Schwartz
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:25 pm
Location: Port Allegany, PA
Contact:

Post by Schwartz »

I was very very tempted to get one. I almost bought one. I was planning to buy one. I then talked myself down and bought a i7 930 instead. I'm playing around with it now to get it stable at 4.2Ghz with HT on. I just couldn't justify the cost benefit ratio. Either way I figure I have a 930 to beat on for now and by the time I get a 6 core most likely the price of it and the 930 combined will be at or below what I would have paid for the 6 core right now.
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

I'm thinking you made the right decision. Honestly, there are not too many apps yet that make use of even 4 cores (better yet 2). Five years from now, that may be a completely different case. However, right now, 4 is plenty... especially with hyperthreading.
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32977
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

The real problem is that current OSes really aren't designed for multicore. Win7 makes better use of multicore than XP or Vista but it's still very inefficient. Coincidentally I read this article yesterday:

Multicore requires OS rework, Windows architect advises
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/0 ... ndows.html
---
“Be careful when a democracy is sick; fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health.”
― Albert Camus

Image
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Good article. Sadly, if they were to develop along those lines, it'll be quite a while. I'm thinking 3-5 years at best. Probably have to ditch a bunch of hardware as well.
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

building two servers at work soon with dual 6-core Xeon X5650 cpus...love it!
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Wish my work would do that. We've got a friggen 3ghz P4 running our server. That's after I told them that I could get a dual processor rig for half the price. Oh well.
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

hehe...yeah, we're not short on keeping things current here, which makes it fun. these are not our most powerful servers (we have about 200 between production/dev/test...60% virtual or so), but definitely "generous" for what they'll be doing.
Post Reply