WD GP serries drives

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7479
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

WD GP serries drives

Post by Pugsley »

So I'm thinking of building a new file server (or rebuilding my current one) and saw that WD had this GP model. Says it changes RPMs and stuff to cut down on power and heat.

Since I will be running them in a RAID 5 config speed isnt that big of a deal. Im just worried about that varaible RPM thing making the drive less reliable. Other then that the GP seems like it would be a good thing to have... other then a plain 5400 rpm drive.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
User avatar
DaMaN
Posts: 4726
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 5:49 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by DaMaN »

I've been looking at these and the RE models too in the 1TB flavor. I am looking to off load my 500GB Drives and upgrade to the TB drives. One thing I read is that the GP drives are picky with RAID controllers so read up before you buy.
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

do not buy western digital.
all you have to do is lookup disk failure statistics and u will see how quickly most WD's fail
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
TruckStuff
Golden Member
Posts: 1056
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 5:17 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by TruckStuff »

TheSovereign wrote:do not buy western digital.
all you have to do is lookup disk failure statistics and u will see how quickly most WD's fail
:s aid:

And the RE drives really piss me off because that tells me that WD knows their drives are crap and need improvement. Buy WD at your own risk.
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7479
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

now last time I bought a drive it was a WD.. and that was... umm... 3 years ago? god It has been that long. Any way they are all WD's but thats probably from the time they were the best. So whats good to look at now? looking for most capacity for the buck, SATA. Speed doesnt matter due to it will be in a raid 5 setup.

Thanks
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

seagate
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Seagate
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
CaterpillarAssassin
Almighty Member
Posts: 2252
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:29 am
Location: somewhere in N.E

Post by CaterpillarAssassin »

To be honest, I'm not sold on seagate. Sure they have a 5 year warranty, But I've had many drives fail well before that. I had 2 Seagate drives giveing the click of death out of the static bag, and 1 drive fail twice in 2 months (RMA'd, then replacement failed). This is out of 6 drives owned/bought for people. Could have been a bad month for them (all produced around same time, except for the replacement RMA).

I guess I shouldn't drop them from my roof before installing??? JK ;)
Image
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10221
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Post by Executioner »

It's a crap shoot, but I've had good luck with Seagate the last 5 years. Not one drive has failed, and I also do not over-clock my system. Currently I have a WD Raptor as my boot drive, and a 500g Seagate for everything else.
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Well, I've got a mix of just about everything in my system running 24/7 for the last 5 years & no failures from any of the drives (2 Maxtors, 2 WD, 1 Seagate). I had a Maxtor drive fail on me a long while ago, but it was used before I got it & was about 3 years old when I got it. Otherwise, the only real problems I've had with drives were the Deathstars. Oddly though, I still have a 40gb Deskstar that is still running to this day at least 4 hours a day for the last.... what 8 years now. It was a refurb when I bought it, so they must have fixed the problem pretty good. My work computer has been running 24/7 with a 20gb Maxtor since I started back in '02. So, I'm thinking that there are just specific drives to avoid & not necessarily a brand. I sure wish Google had released their statistics on their drive failures that they said they were suprised by. They said something similar.
User avatar
ZYFER
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida

Post by ZYFER »

Also agree with Seagate. I have 4 750GB drives currently running in Raid.

WD drives just aren't the best to look at for standard hard drives. Their notebook drives seem oddly durable for some reason though.

There is always risk for failure, I mean these things do have moving parts. A simple malfunction on the manufacturing line could cause many bad ones to go out before it gets noticed.

All hard drives fail at some point, it is just a matter of how quickly and how badly. That is the reason for Raid and backups.
User avatar
Err
Life Member
Posts: 5842
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:54 am

Post by Err »

I've never had problems with WD. I may just be lucky though.
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7479
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

Yeah, they are going into a 24/7 raid 5 array... so as long as 3 dont up and die in one week I will be ok.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
Post Reply