simplest way to secure wireless net

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

simplest way to secure wireless net

Post by wvjohn »

ok, just got my dad to upgrade to broadband and slapped a new linksys wireless router in (checking email on the beach :) )... there will only be 3 computers using this for now...looked at the security choices and picked the 128bit, which gave me a hash that i forgot to write down, so i reset it to wide-open - what's the simplest way to lock it down??? that will also defeat most war drivers.....TIA

will post picks from the beach
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

I would use mac address filtering myself since you only have 3 addys you want to be able to access it.. Then they won't be able to do jack unless they know the IPs to use.

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

i only use MAC filtering as security on mine...but i don't really care if someone uses my wireless (unlikely unless they park in my driveway...i might notice that...hehe). MAC filtering is pretty much useless if the person sniffs the packets and then spoofs your MAC, but would definitely keep the commoners away.

i recommend just using the MAC filtering and also disable the SSID broadcast. beyond that you need to enable encryption.
Jim Z
Golden Member
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 9:22 pm
Location: MI

Post by Jim Z »

looked at the security choices and picked the 128bit, which gave me a hash that i forgot to write down, so i reset it to wide-open - what's the simplest way to lock it down???
If your equipment supports WPA, use that. WEP is so weak as to be useless.
User avatar
Busby
Golden Member
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 6:25 pm
Location: Atlanta Area, GA, USA
Contact:

Post by Busby »

Originally posted by Jim Z
If your equipment supports WPA, use that. WEP is so weak as to be useless.


What he said.
<a href="mailto:busby1218@charter.net">
<img src="http://justinbusby.com:8080/signature.gif" border="0"></a>
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Post by wvjohn »

thx gang, i'll see if I can figure out how to do that
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33162
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

For casual security 128bit WEP is okay.

If you want a bit more security and your NICs and AP are a year old then they should support WPA which is better than WEP.

Anything can be cracked though, so if you file share then use passwords on all your user accounts (you can setup the computers to autologon).
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
ZYFER
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida

Post by ZYFER »

Using MAC Address filtering is good if you want to keep people off your network, using WPA is good to add that little bit extra of security to make you feel your private data is not being viewed by someone else.

Usually if someone sees a network is encrypted, they just keep going.
When all else fails, replace the user.
Post Reply