New computer...slower marks than previous computer

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

New computer...slower marks than previous computer

Post by Absolut Talent »

Previously, i had an

xp1800+ (palimino)
640mb pc2100
gigabyte ga7vaxp ultra
9800pro (128mb) (cats 4.5)
Win2k (latest patches and updates)

and I got decent scores.
3dmark2001- 11,127
3dmark2003- 5090
Aquamark- 28,973


Now I just upgraded. My new system

xp2500+ (barton)
1g (2x 512) pc3200 Kingston HyperX
Abit nf7-s2g
9800pro (128mb)(cats 4.5)
win2k (latest patches and updates)

And my scores are lower than my previous system. 3dmark 2001 is getting 9700, 3dmark 2003 is getting around 5300, and aquamark is getting around 23,xxx.

I adjusted my bios already, and i dont know what else to do to bring my system up to par of where it should be.

my bios were adjusted in the Abit SoftMenu as follows:

System Performance- Expert
FSB- 166
CPU Interface- Agressive
Memory Frequency- SPD (which sets it to 200mhz)
Memory Timings- Expert
~Row Active Delay- 6
~Ras to Cas Delay- 3
~Row Precharge Delay- 2
~Cas- 2.5 (cant set this to anything other than 2.5 or 3, their bios release problem)

And voltages across the board were upped to the next highest choice
I cant figure out what else to change to bring my scores up. Already had the AA and AF turned off. What else should I do?
Gone for good. But never say never
User avatar
Busby
Golden Member
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 6:25 pm
Location: Atlanta Area, GA, USA
Contact:

Post by Busby »

Have you tried synching your memory speed with your CPU speed?
<a href="mailto:busby1218@charter.net">
<img src="http://justinbusby.com:8080/signature.gif" border="0"></a>
User avatar
The_Frapster
Golden Member
Posts: 885
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 12:13 pm

Post by The_Frapster »

Yeah, try to raise the fsb up a little on the cpu to get to 200, that way your memory and CPU are running synch. You will notice a big difference.
Run fer your lives!!! The_Frapster's Coming!!!

<a title="Click here to view my Heatware Profile" href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=28300">
[ HEATWARE.com ]</a>
<a title="Click here to view My E-bay Profile" href="http://cgi2.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=the_frapster&ssPageName=STRK:ME:UFS">
[ eBay.com ]</a></p>
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

I agree ditch the SPD setting and make your memory and CPU run in sync with each other.
Image
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7512
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

ditto.. pull the SPD setting off and put it at 100% so that its the same as the FSB. then if you want you cna start bumping the FSB up and start overclocking.
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

well i matched the ram with the processor, they are both set to 166.
the scores went up a bit to what they were previously, but they are still lower than my xp1800 marks. It doesnt make sense. Everything is faster than my previous proc, ram, mobo, so even at default speeds, my marks should be higher.

I want to work on getting them higher at default speeds before I overclock.
Gone for good. But never say never
User avatar
BillyGoat
Almighty Member
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:07 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post by BillyGoat »

Jim- im at a loss, even ay stock settings the new setup should toast your old- keep me up to date
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=Billygoat(pcabusers)&border=0,255,0&label=255,0,0&header=0,0,255&stats=0,0,0&bgcolor=255,255,0&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="PCA Folding Rules!" />[/align]
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

done a bunch of crap...still no major success

my 3dmark01 score is still lower by a few hundred
mark03 is slightly higher by 200-300
aquamark is lower by 1000


I have tried the new omega drivers, they didnt help. So that leaves me to believe its not the vidcard thats the problem. I think the problem lies somewhere in the motherboard and the way its using the proc and ram

I have changed my memory settings to 2.5-2-2-5 (2.5-2-2-11 which i heard was an nforce sweetspot, didnt yeild better results)

the memory and fsb are matched
I have changed what dimm slots the ram is in, tried 1+2, 2+3, currently left in 1+3 cause i heard thats the dual channel slots. (how can I tell that DC is enabled?)

I might have to pull my old ga7vaxp down and swap everything over to there and give it a shot. I dont want to....but if i do and it shows better results, then I know its the motherboard at fault.
Gone for good. But never say never
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

pffftt....that motherboard is crap


put all the stuffs back into my gigabyte ga7vaxp ultra (kt400) and the scores are higher, like where i think they should be

3dmark2001- 14,668
3dmark2003- 5515
aquamark- 35,417

So now, to transfer it all back to the otherboard to back my stuff back up to reformat and move it all back to my kt400

So what should I do with the new board? RMA and give it another shot? or just sell it? Or try returning it? (bought it from ExcaliberPC.com last week)
Gone for good. But never say never
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

I bet it is a bios thing.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

Originally posted by nexus_7
I bet it is a bios thing.

Greg

im sure it is....what kind of a bios only gives you two choices for your CAS setting? (2.5 and 3, thats it)
Gone for good. But never say never
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

user error. ;)

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

Originally posted by nexus_7
user error. ;)

Greg


bullcrap it is :D
Gone for good. But never say never
User avatar
BillyGoat
Almighty Member
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:07 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post by BillyGoat »

are you gonna flash that bad boy or what?
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=Billygoat(pcabusers)&border=0,255,0&label=255,0,0&header=0,0,255&stats=0,0,0&bgcolor=255,255,0&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="PCA Folding Rules!" />[/align]
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

Originally posted by BillyGoat
are you gonna flash that bad boy or what?


well...once they release a new set of bios for it, sure

the boards only been out for like a week. And their last bios was updated late last month
Gone for good. But never say never
Post Reply