Page 1 of 2

any one suck down aquamark yet?

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:08 pm
by nexus_7
http://www.aquamark3.com/am3-mirrors.htm down load links there. Im getting it at liek 200k a sec at the bottom America link

Greg

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 1:23 pm
by Absolut Talent
im averging about 188 from the 2nd to the bottom link

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 1:26 pm
by nexus_7
hmm, that was the bottom one when I click around. :) so that was the one I was using that one 2.

Greg

my test score done twice :(

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:20 pm
by renovation
: Benchmark 2003-09-15 14-53-45

Processor:
Vendor: AuthenticAMD
Name: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+
SpeedMHz: 1533
Type: 0
Family: 6
Model: 6
Stepping: 2
Flags: 0xC1CBFBFF
Number: 1
HyperThreading: n/a
MemoryOS: 804769792

Graphics:
Description: RADEON 7000 SERIES
Vendor: 4098
Device: 20825
SubSys: 33691527
Revision: 0
CoreClock: 142
MemoryClock: 142
Driver: ati2dvag.dll
DriverVersion: 6.14.10.6378
VideoMemory: 67108864
TextureMemory: 117440512

OperatingSystem:
Version: Microsoft Windows XP
Type:
Build: Service Pack 1 2600

Run0:
DisplayWidth: 1024
DisplayHeight: 768
DisplayDepth: 32
AntialiasingMode: 0
AntialiasingQuality: 0
AnisotropicFiltering: 4
DetailLevel: 4
AvgFPS: 3.672353
MinFPS: 0.905794
MaxFPS: 11.505354
AvgFPSRender: 3.832778
AvgFPSSimulation: 87.738327
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 1700311
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 261120
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 4698326
AquamarkScoreRender: 384
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 4387
AquamarkScore: 3672

click here for AquaMark Frequently Asked Questions

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:51 pm
by b-man1
General:
Name: Benchmark 2003-09-16 20-44-37

Processor:
Vendor: GenuineIntel
Name: Pentium(R) 4 processor
SpeedMHz: 2793
Type: 0
Family: 15
Model: 2
Stepping: 1
Flags: 0xBFEBFBFF
Number: 1
HyperThreading: activated and used
MemoryOS: 804253696

Graphics:
Description: RADEON 9800
Vendor: 4098
Device: 20040
SubSys: 805441538
Revision: 0
CoreClock: 324
MemoryClock: 290
Driver: ati2dvag.dll
DriverVersion: 6.14.10.6343
VideoMemory: 134217728
TextureMemory: 250609664

OperatingSystem:
Version: Microsoft Windows XP
Type:
Build: Service Pack 1 2600

Run0:
DisplayWidth: 1024
DisplayHeight: 768
DisplayDepth: 32
AntialiasingMode: 0
AntialiasingQuality: 0
AnisotropicFiltering: 4
DetailLevel: 4
AvgFPS: 37.418434
MinFPS: 9.842457
MaxFPS: 128.000000
AvgFPSRender: 48.007526
AvgFPSSimulation: 169.623642
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 11263425
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 1472984
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 25818998
AquamarkScoreRender: 4800
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 8482
AquamarkScore: 37418

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:29 pm
by nexus_7
1700+ at like 2100+ and a 9800pro

Benchmark 2003-09-16 21-26-59

Processor:
Vendor: AuthenticAMD
Name: AMD Athlon(tm)
SpeedMHz: 1886
Type: 0
Family: 6
Model: 8
Stepping: 0
Flags: 0xC1C3FBFF
Number: 1
HyperThreading: n/a
MemoryOS: 1073201152

Graphics:
Description: RADEON 9800 PRO
Vendor: 4098
Device: 20040
SubSys: 135170
Revision: 0
CoreClock: 378
MemoryClock: 338
Driver: ati2dvag.dll
DriverVersion: 6.14.10.6378
VideoMemory: 134217728
TextureMemory: 251658240

OperatingSystem:
Version: Microsoft Windows 2000
Type:
Build: Service Pack 4 2195

Run0:
DisplayWidth: 1024
DisplayHeight: 768
DisplayDepth: 32
AntialiasingMode: 0
AntialiasingQuality: 0
AnisotropicFiltering: 4
DetailLevel: 4
AvgFPS: 32.547005
MinFPS: 9.689944
MaxFPS: 88.000000
AvgFPSRender: 46.329319
AvgFPSSimulation: 110.846809
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 9797695
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 1472220
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 27222002
AquamarkScoreRender: 4632
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 5542
AquamarkScore: 32547

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:29 pm
by BillyGoat
non dx 9 cards gonna score way low? Is it even worth th DL if you dont have a dx9 card (poorhouse here)

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:06 pm
by nexus_7
it looks neet eithor way. and yea, they will probably be rather low. Bellringer is running a dx7 card and it has one less "0" then the rest of us.

another neet benchmark is gun metal VERY cool looking

Greg

Anybody have a link..

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 7:49 pm
by eGoCeNTRoNiX
to DX9.0b? I hate going to the windows download site.. If you can email it to me, drop me a PM for my Nonrestricted attachment email addy.. TIA eGo

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:35 pm
by wvjohn
30,295 barton @2122 9500 pro 8rda+ 1 gig @ 172 fsb

looks like this rig will handle the new stuff

my work box has something seriously wrong with the drivers i think - guy who reloaded all of them used generic xp drivers - it's pulling 6000 with a 2200 at 133 fsb with a 9600 pro :(

more: 15xxx on my backup, which is a 1700+ default with an 8500

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 10:18 am
by TheDude
Here's my latest on the p4 ee review sample...

General:

Name: Benchmark 2003-09-26 07-28-16

Processor:

Vendor: GenuineIntel

Name: Pentium(R) 4 processor

SpeedMHz: 3198

Type: 0

Family: 15

Model: 2

Stepping: 5

Flags: 0xBFEBFBFF

Number: 1

HyperThreading: activated and used

MemoryOS: 1072410624

Graphics:

Description: RADEON 9800 PRO

Vendor: 4098

Device: 20040

SubSys: 135170

Revision: 0

CoreClock: 414

MemoryClock: 365

Driver: ati2dvag.dll

DriverVersion: 6.14.10.6378

VideoMemory: 134217728

TextureMemory: 250609664

OperatingSystem:

Version: Microsoft Windows XP

Type:

Build: Service Pack 1 2600

Run0:

DisplayWidth: 1024

DisplayHeight: 768

DisplayDepth: 32

AntialiasingMode: 0

AntialiasingQuality: 0

AnisotropicFiltering: 4

DetailLevel: 4

AvgFPS: 48.908092

MinFPS: 12.858536

MaxFPS: 150.099396

AvgFPSRender: 64.133957

AvgFPSSimulation: 206.033936

AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 14721958

MinTrianglesPerSecond: 1977968

MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 34011660

AquamarkScoreRender: 6414

AquamarkScoreSimulation: 10302

AquamarkScore: 48908

Well,

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 10:54 am
by eGoCeNTRoNiX
I didn't find that detailed stats page yet, but here's my stuff..

Epox 8RDA+
XP1700+ Tbred B @ 2107mhz
512MB PC3200 Corsair XMS Platinum
Xtasy Ti4400 OCd to Ti4600

16,809 (not the greatest score I know, but not bad I don't guess)

eGo

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:14 pm
by renovation
man do i need a upgrade on my video card :(

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 11:40 pm
by BillyGoat
ok
managed to run it tonight on my p4 2.0@2500
ti4200@4600

18,809 - didnt look all that pretty at all, me thinks i need direct x9 card

Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 11:26 pm
by wvjohn
here's my latest

9500 NP softmod 375/325

barton@2.2GHZ 1 GB ram fsb 192

39, 580