USB 2.0 card required for new scanner?

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
EvilHorace
Life Member
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
Location: Greenfield, WI

USB 2.0 card required for new scanner?

Post by EvilHorace »

I bought a new Canon scanner that's USB 2.0 (which is new to me) but I'm not sure if I need an additional USB 2.0 card for maximum speed advantage or not. My ~1.5 yr old mobo ( Shuttle AK31) has 4 USB slots but I have no idea if it's USB 2.0 or 1.1 or how to tell.
The scanner works OK as is but might anyone here know if I need a 2.0 card and if I'd make a difference? The people at the local BB seem to give me different answers so I'm not sure.
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
User avatar
MegaVectra
Posts: 2699
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 5:33 am
Location: WV
Contact:

Post by MegaVectra »

I would assume it would be back-wards compatible. Which model is it? Are you experiencing any problems with it?
User avatar
Judg3
Golden Member
Posts: 896
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 9:08 pm
Location: Waukesha, WI USA
Contact:

Post by Judg3 »

Yeah, USB 2.0 is supposedly backwards compatible (if the vendor writes the drives, etc, properly). Since your board is 1.5 years old, I doubt it's got 2.0. But to check open up COmputer Management under Control Panel/Administrative Tools then look under the "Components" tab of the "System Information" part. It would say "USB 2.0 Root Hub".

Odds are, it might transfer the info from the scanner to your PC slower if it's not using usb 2.0, but thats about the only downside.
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

the ak31 has usb 1.1...i have the same mobo. i bought a 2.0 card and hub for it. it is backwards compatible but MUCH slower.
User avatar
EvilHorace
Life Member
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
Location: Greenfield, WI

Post by EvilHorace »

That answers most of my question, thanks.
It is backwords compatible and works BUT if it's any faster by adding a $39 card, then that's what I'll do. It's a Canon Canoscan 5000F that I bought mainly to scan my MANY old 35mm slides to the HDD so that I won't need to use the old slide projector equipment for that anymore (pure digital for me from now on). My new DVD player also runs jpegs through the TV.

Now....I've seen the card but do I then need a hub as well?
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Not unless..

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

You want to use the 2.0 on more than the two devices. If you don't have a need for it at this time, not need to spend more money than you have to. eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
EvilHorace
Life Member
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
Location: Greenfield, WI

Post by EvilHorace »

I don't think that any other USB device (eFilm reader-4, 2+ yr old Digital camera, Garmin eMap, cordless mouse/keyboard) uses USB 2.0 as I've never read that term before until recently, when I bought this scanner.
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
blade
Posts: 9113
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 1:56 am
Location: LV-426
Contact:

Post by blade »

I have my doubts that you'll see a big speed increase on a 2.0 port. Though my only way of testing it so far is uploadiong images from my camera. Using a usb 2.0 it is roughly 30-40% quicker. But 1.1 wasn't slow.

My scanner is usb also and I can't tell any speed diff from 1.1 to 2.0. But I think it is probably only 1.1.
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=blade&border=0,0,64&custom=21,138,255&label=79,79,255&header=149,202,255&stats=0,255,255&bgcolor=0,0,181&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="www.Statgfx.com" />
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

2.0 can make a huge difference...just depends on what you're doing. i have a USB 2.0 hard drive and tried copying 20GB of mp3's onto a USB 1.1 system. let's just say i cancelled the transfer. :(

card readers don't go that fast because of the flash memory cards i bet. their transfer rate is limited, so a big difference is not seen between the two. when using cdrw or hard drives...then 2.0 shines.
User avatar
smb
Almighty Member
Posts: 2156
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:27 am
Location: devils arm pit, McAllen, TX

Post by smb »

It all depends on th size of the scanned image. If your image sizes are small, it wouldn't be beneficial, but if they are large, 50+ megs than I would say get the add in card.
User avatar
EvilHorace
Life Member
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
Location: Greenfield, WI

Post by EvilHorace »

I installed it and the scanner does scan faster now so I'm happy. The card gave me a few probs as it the ol' PC was fussy about which slot I was trying but after 3 attempts and some snarling, I finally found the acceptable slot :)
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
Post Reply