Okay, NOW I'm recommending NTFS partitions (at least for video drives...)
Posted: Fri May 31, 2002 12:54 pm
I used to basically recommend using FAT32 for home users - and I still do for any partitions containing critical data.
Why? Because if your OS takes a dump, you can easily access the files on a FAT32 partition from a DOS boot floppy or Win98 (if you dual boot).
If the partition is formated in NTFS then you either have to first re-install Win2K/XP to access your files (which may take all day depending on the problem) or move the drive to another computer that's running Win2K or XP.
BUT I just started working on some large video projects for a client. Up until now I've only made relatively small video projects and never had to capture really large AVIs.
However, on this project I was running into a size limit problem when capturing long videos.
The problem is that FAT32 has an inherent 4Gb max file size limitation (and 4Gb is a pretty short video in RAW uncompressed AVI).
NTFS has a max file size limit of 4Tb (terrabytes!).
Needless to say I just reformatted my 20Gb video project partition in NTFS.
Why? Because if your OS takes a dump, you can easily access the files on a FAT32 partition from a DOS boot floppy or Win98 (if you dual boot).
If the partition is formated in NTFS then you either have to first re-install Win2K/XP to access your files (which may take all day depending on the problem) or move the drive to another computer that's running Win2K or XP.
BUT I just started working on some large video projects for a client. Up until now I've only made relatively small video projects and never had to capture really large AVIs.
However, on this project I was running into a size limit problem when capturing long videos.
The problem is that FAT32 has an inherent 4Gb max file size limitation (and 4Gb is a pretty short video in RAW uncompressed AVI).
NTFS has a max file size limit of 4Tb (terrabytes!).
Needless to say I just reformatted my 20Gb video project partition in NTFS.