Page 1 of 2
what is your res is your desktop set to, and why
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 6:17 pm
by VooDoo
what is your res is your desktop set to, and why
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 6:28 pm
by MAC
I run mine at 1152 x 864. After installing XP Pro, the desktop icons at 1024 x 768 looked kinda blurry so I upped the resolution to 1152. Any higher and I can't read them.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 7:03 pm
by Hipnotic_Tranz
1280x1024 on a 19" monitor. I like the destkop room, although recently I hvae made it so there is not a single icon on my desktop

. I have changed all my fonts and made them bigger to make them easier to read.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 7:23 pm
by d_b
Monitor 1-1280x1024@60 Hertz, Monitor 2 - 1280x1024@100Hertz. Seems to be easist on the eyes.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 7:36 pm
by Busby
1600x1200 because, basically, I can. I mean you don't really worry about scrolling on a lot of things and plus why not?

Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 8:03 pm
by JonasWorld
1024x768 on a 19in flatscreen
Any smaller and I can't read any writing. Although maybe I need to do what HT does and bump up my font size.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 8:06 pm
by blade
1152x864x32 on a 19"
Just seems the best fit for my eyes. I do have the font size larger though.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 8:29 pm
by FlyingPenguin
Dual monitors here:
1280 x 960 on the main 19" monitor
1152 x 864 on the 2nd 19"
Using the Windows Standard Large text layout.
I like the res set as high as I can comfortably stand it. The more desktop real estate the better.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 8:33 pm
by FuNPoLiCe001
1152 x 864, nice ratio, 1280 x 1024 is too flat
and i like how i can see better since my screen is like 3 feet away from me
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 8:40 pm
by VooDoo
Originally posted by Busby
1600x1200 because, basically, I can. I mean you don't really worry about scrolling on a lot of things and plus why not?
did think they vould get that big (er small i mean)
me
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 11:24 pm
by Jim Z
1280x1024 because that's my LCD's native resolution. Anything else looks like ass.
Posted: Tue May 28, 2002 12:25 am
by Executioner
1152x864x32 on a 17" monitor, but for gaming, I use 800x600.
Posted: Tue May 28, 2002 6:22 am
by VidmanII
rig #1
20" = 11 x 8
19" = 11 x 8
both @ 100 Hz, 32-bit
rig #2
17" = 10 x 7, 85 Hz, 32-bit
Posted: Tue May 28, 2002 12:30 pm
by DocSilly
1600x1200 on my 21" Sony cause I can and I really got used to the available desktop space.
Posted: Tue May 28, 2002 2:15 pm
by wvjohn
1024x768 'cause that's the best I can see with these cheap glasses
