is this true

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
fearfox
Golden Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 9:58 am
Location: Los Angeles California
Contact:

is this true

Post by fearfox »

i overheard some guys yesterday at work saying that when you have newtwork you can share resources but also your processors.

how do you make all your processors act as one?

anyone know how do this or do you need program. whichever it needs can any pop me link or your 2 cents

thx i appreciated :D
User avatar
EvilHorace
Life Member
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
Location: Greenfield, WI

NOT true

Post by EvilHorace »

.....total BS. You're being hosed. Networking allows file sharing but that's as far as it goes.


(additionally)
.....well OK, printer and internet connection sharing too on conventional home networked PCs.
4 networked PCs here so far :)
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

when they said "share your processors" they probably ment share your computers, which often times people refer to computers as CPU's. Which confuse me right there.... I don't know if you've experienced this, but I have several times and I always have to correct them cause I hate when people point at the box and say "CPU" or point at the monitor and say "computer." It's just the wrong terminology
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
tyler_durden
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 2:20 am
Location: AGGIELAND: College Station, Texas

Post by tyler_durden »

distributed computing?
"Life is short, Factoring is long"
-G. R. Blakley

"I'm like the Pythagorean Theorum, I cant be solved"
--Shaquille O'Neal
User avatar
fearfox
Golden Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 9:58 am
Location: Los Angeles California
Contact:

naw it was some of the office assitants

Post by fearfox »

discussing while i was reloading os on their computers.
User avatar
Koo Koo Mouse
Posts: 1712
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 5:09 pm
Location: Osseo MN

Post by Koo Koo Mouse »

LOL!
Yep.. I see people pointing at the box and calling it the "hard drive". Or peeps saying they "downloaded" the game into there computer when it was simpily a cd install and had nothing to do with the internet..
GeForce GTX 970
AMD FX 8350 8 core Processor
16 GIG
Seems plenty good for gaming! :)
User avatar
Schwartz
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:25 pm
Location: Port Allegany, PA
Contact:

Post by Schwartz »

overheard some guys yesterday at work saying that when you have newtwork you can share resources but also your processors.


True, if you built a beowulf cluster all boxes would do the work.

http://www.beowulf.org/
User avatar
EvilHorace
Life Member
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:14 am
Location: Greenfield, WI

Schwartz

Post by EvilHorace »

That sounds interesting but that link's dead (inop). Might you have more info or another url? I'm curious.
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images/evil2.gif">
Darkheart
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:11 am
Location: West Yorkshire UK

Post by Darkheart »

Actually you can, just not the way your thinking about it, it's not like joining 3 1Ghz computers together to get a 3Ghz Monster, more about sharing resources.

You can share CPU resources but it's not for home use the most commonly used version of this is Citrix Load Balancing where users are distributed across your different Citrix Servers as the load increases so you maximise your resources. Have a look at NT Server Clustering also.

Darkheart
User avatar
Schwartz
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:25 pm
Location: Port Allegany, PA
Contact:

Post by Schwartz »

If you do a search on google for beowulf cluster you should find some more info.
User avatar
tyler_durden
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 2:20 am
Location: AGGIELAND: College Station, Texas

Post by tyler_durden »

its the same thing that seti does. distribute the info to be processed by many machines over a network. there are many different levels and setups. but the basic idea is the same.
"Life is short, Factoring is long"
-G. R. Blakley

"I'm like the Pythagorean Theorum, I cant be solved"
--Shaquille O'Neal
User avatar
poop
Golden Member
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2001 12:40 pm
Location: Lexington, KY
Contact:

Post by poop »

Actually...

If you hack your TCP/IP stack, you can put bogus CRC's into the packets you send out. Then, when the recieving computer calculates the CRC's to check for data integrity, the other computer's resources are being forced to calculate whatever you put in the bogus CRC. It is called parasitic computing. The ony way to stop it is to disconnect from the internet (or an TCP/IP based network, that is). It is kind of a way to force a TCP/IP network to become a processor for you.
- p o o p
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

and there are also development platforms that allow various levels of distributed computing and client/server technology....sun microsystems has "Forte" which can be both distributed and load balancing if the software is written to take full advantage of it. this is different than seti, which isn't real-time distributed computing...seti just breaks the work up among many computers, but they don't all work on something at the same time, if you know what i mean.

.02
Darkheart
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:11 am
Location: West Yorkshire UK

Post by Darkheart »

Poop that sounds interesting but is it really worth it? I mean the amount of processing power your gonna be able to leach is pretty pathetic even if you have a monster connection. Let's say your using a LAN to perpetrate this, that means you could send and recieve an absolute maximum of 100Mbps. Divide that down and you looking at 12.5 Mbytes of data a sec, which an old 486 could probably pump without a problem.

Doesn't sound worthwhile to me.

Darkheart
Post Reply