Athlon 2500XP vs. 3000XP: Hype or Not?

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
Jason Spaceman
Genuine Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 2:17 pm
Contact:

Athlon 2500XP vs. 3000XP: Hype or Not?

Post by Jason Spaceman »

Ok, so I'm planning on building a new computer, started out at first with a 2500XP chip then bumped it up to 2800XP for a little more power. But reconsidered and brought it back down to 2500XP after I was told by a few people the increase wasn't that great and not worth the price.

Talking to a computer guy the other day about this and he said the 2500XP at 1.80 GHz was junk. He suggested a 2.2GHz was the lowest to go. He knows a lot about computer and I'm inclined to trust him because he's helped me out in the past. Again, I'm reluctant to OC anything for fear of damaging my system. My neighbor had an OC-ed video card and it literally blew up on him. Sure, it's not the same but still...

So, what about a 3000XP then? Is it significantly faster then a 2500/2800XP? Is it worth the money? A 2500XP Barton is fine for my needs but I would like to have a little more power down the line, y'know? It's about a $150 difference (newegg prices, roughly) between the 25000Xp and 3000XP. If it's worth it I'll hold off a month or so and get the 3000XP.

Remember this is my first custom system, so I'm looking for more experienced and knowledgeable (that's you guys) advice. As always, Thanks.
User avatar
DoPeY5007
Almighty Member
Posts: 4259
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 5:50 pm
Location: Moved to the hood, a few blocks from USC
Contact:

Post by DoPeY5007 »

ok that guy who said that a 1.8ghz is "Junk" doesn't know anything.



You will be fine with the 2500+ ( I have it ) and you really wouldnt see much dif with the 3000+ to the 2500+ ( when encoding something you may )



I have OC'd mine a lil, but brought it back down.



the 2500+ is a good buy
Image Image Image

"I'm seriously going to pummel you until you purr like a bitch-kitten!!"
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

I agree that guy is just wrong. I have a 2500+ and at stock speed it is plenty fast. However I have mine over clocked. It is now detected as an XP 3200 and runs at 2250Mhz. If money is no issue sure go for the faster chip but if you want bang for the buck the 2500 is the way to go.
Image
Jason Spaceman
Genuine Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 2:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Jason Spaceman »

Originally posted by DoPeY5007
ok that guy who said that a 1.8ghz is "Junk" doesn't know anything.



You will be fine with the 2500+ ( I have it ) and you really wouldnt see much dif with the 3000+ to the 2500+ ( when encoding something you may )



I have OC'd mine a lil, but brought it back down.



the 2500+ is a good buy


See, that's what I'm thinking. But whenever I talk to these techie guys they keep telling me to go with a P4 @ 2.4 GHz or a 2800Xp+ (or higher) at least. Basically saying it's a better value in the long run to go with a higher Ghz chip. Maybe they are biased since they both are hardcore gamers and such. Yet it seems sensible. Is the difference between a 1.80 and 2.2 really so great that it justifies the price and is it noticeable? I'm using my PC mostly for casual use: light gaming, word processing, internet browsing, dvd watching, mix making, etc, etc.

I don't know if 3000XP is worth it though. I'd rather spend the extra cash to get a DVD-RW drive if anything. But I still want my PC to be respectable a year or two from now.

I'm just throwing it out there for some different opinions/views.

Y'know, you start simple and it just escalates...
(He says as he thinks about Atomic fan grills :d )
User avatar
BillyGoat
Almighty Member
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:07 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post by BillyGoat »

ok currently my main rig has a p4@2500 and my next cpu "UPGRADE" is going to be to a 2500+barton 1.8

Now does that tell you anything?
aND NO, i AM NOT CRAZY
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=Billygoat(pcabusers)&border=0,255,0&label=255,0,0&header=0,0,255&stats=0,0,0&bgcolor=255,255,0&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="PCA Folding Rules!" />[/align]
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Yo...

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

My thoughts are telling me these "techies" are just wanting you to buy the most expensive and best thing out there.. But is the 400mhz really worth the diff? I have 7 computers working on an 8th one. Ranging from a P200MMX - XP1800+@1.64ghz. I underclocked my XP1800+ to 1.3 one time just to see what it was like, I hardly noticed a dfference. That's 300mhz.. The only places you're going to notice a difference in these speeds are in the encoding of videos (That's why a lot of the guys who do this run duallies) and it will have a slight impact on gaming, but the biggest impact on your gaming will be your video card. So, like you said, save the $150 and buy a DVD-RW.. eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

By any chance is your techie buddy trying to sell you a chip or get you to buy one from one of his buddies? To me once you get around 1.4gigs and up it is hard to tell the difference in casual use, you almost have to run a benchmark or pay attention to how fast it crunches a work unit in F@H to see the difference.
Image
Absolut Talent
Almighty Member
Posts: 2868
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 12:30 pm

Post by Absolut Talent »

i agree with everyone else...

ditch that "the xp3000 is higher up so its better" crap your buddy told ya
the 2500 barton is good enough
Gone for good. But never say never
Jason Spaceman
Genuine Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 2:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Jason Spaceman »

Naw, nobody is selling me any chips. Just wanted to see what the genreal consensus was. My cousin suggested the P4 @2.4 and another friend suggested the 3000Xp. At a $150 difference, I wanted a 3rd opinion (or five or six!). These are also the type of guys who only buy the latest/fastest video cards to play Unreal 2 with ALL the effects on. So they may lean toward the high end stuff. Think I'm going to stick with the 2500XP Barton.


Thanks everyone.


But since we're here, let's say hypothetically I wanted to OC the 2500XP, how difficult would it be? And would I be in danger of frying the whole system?

Just curious.
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

yea, get the 2500+ and OC it. its really easy and really have under minimal chance of killing anything.

Just raise the Front side bus or the multiplier in the bios and go from there.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Post by wvjohn »

2500 is perfectly adequate - i am running mine at about stock and don't notice much difference between that and the 2100 i was running at 2.33 - it is a very good value and easy to overclock if you choose to
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
User avatar
Gand1
Posts: 681
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:29 am
Location: Bethlehem, PA
Contact:

Post by Gand1 »

Hell I'm running my 2100 stock but my vid card is a 9700pro. That's what makes the biggest difference! :)
I'm...... BATMAN!

No Greyhound Racing
Image
Post Reply