80MPG 1987 Ford Mustang Produces 400 Horsepower

This car is systematic, hyyydromatic...why it's greased lightning!
Post Reply
User avatar
Err
Life Member
Posts: 5842
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:54 am

80MPG 1987 Ford Mustang Produces 400 Horsepower

Post by Err »

80MPG 1987 Ford Mustang Produces 400 Horsepower
Maybe Ford should take a look at Doug Pelmear’s 1987 Ford Mustang before the 2010 Mustang rolls off the assembly line. According to him he has been able to re-engineer his Mustangs engine to produce 400 Horsepower and 500 Torque while improving his gas mileage to an astounding 80 Miles per gallon. He created the car to compete in the $10 million Progressive Automotive X Prize which is a “race” to find an affordable, marketable automobile that gets at least 100 miles per gallon, or its equivalent. You can read the complete article after the fold.

Image

Doug Pelmear has lots of secrets beneath the hood of his black 1987 Ford Mustang on which the only outward hint of individuality is a series of stickers.

But looks can be deceiving. Mr. Pelmear’s 21-year-old pony car has enough technological innovation to quadruple the classic Mustang’s original gas mileage while almost doubling its available horsepower.

That’s 80 miles per gallon and 400 horsepower, folks. And the 48-year-old electronics engineer and master mechanic is not done yet.

The third-generation automotive tinkerer hopes that next year his Mustang - more specifically its engine - will help him win the $10 million Progressive Automotive X Prize: a “race” to find an affordable, marketable automobile that gets at least 100 miles per gallon, or its equivalent.

“I’m an optimist, and I think people need to know there is hope out there,” Mr. Pelmear said. “That’s why I decided to enter the X Prize race. I could have sold this [technology] off, but then people might not have seen it.

“It’s not about the money. Our country really needs this.”

The Progressive Automotive X Prize is sponsored by the X Prize Foundation to focus attention on and improve technology for real-world fuel economy.

Private teams compete in two categories, mainstream and concept, and compete against one another in a staged race that will judge performance, fuel economy, and marketability. There are no official entrants yet, but scores of teams have signed letters of intent to participate in the races, scheduled for 2009.

What radical technology did Mr. Pelmear introduce? His patents are not fully in place, but he said it mostly is a matter of electronics and precision.

“We redesigned a lot of different things on the [engine] block,” the engineer said.

“It’s still a rod-and-piston engine; it just has a lot more electronics on it.”

Mr. Pelmear said that traditional gas engines operate “at a very low efficiency, like 8 to 10 percent, and our engine is like at 38 percent efficiency.”

He said he could greatly increase even that number if his car used traditional gasoline instead of a mix of gas and 85 percent ethanol, which burns hotter but releases fewer hydrocarbons into the atmosphere.

His engine also would be more efficient if he had sacrificed some of its 400 horsepower or 500 foot-pounds of torque, but Mr. Pelmear said his design is intended for “real-world” uses, not the laboratory.

“I’m not the highest-miles-per-gallon vehicle entered in the X Prize, but I think I’m the more consumer friendly, more down to earth, more conventional,” he said.

Mr. Pelmear’s Mustang is entered in the X Prize’s “mainstream” competition against other modified pro-
duction cars.

According to the X Prize foundation, he will compete against several dozen other vehicles from around the world.
:bull
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9514
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Used to have one just like that. Only got about 27mpg on the highway.
User avatar
Err
Life Member
Posts: 5842
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:54 am

Post by Err »

I had an 86 2.3L bored 30 over. I think I only got mid 20's with it. I miss that car but it was starting to nickle and dime me.
User avatar
Key Keeper
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:17 pm
Location: Austin TX

Post by Key Keeper »

:bull for sure. "85 percent ethanol" does produce more heat but requires twice as much to achieve a nondistructive air/fuel ratio (post combustion). Combustion=Heat=expansion(quench area)=downward force on top of piston=crankshaft turning.... Only real benefit is that you can run super high compression ratios like 14 to 1+ when using ethanol due to its octane rating. Hence why a dirt track car running a 30gal fuel cell full of ethanol is on empty after 20 laps(short track). There is usually ice forming on the intake manifold and compression ratios on dirt track engines are usually very high (cept the cheap a$$ dirtballers). Ethanol creates tremendous heat (distructive) when ran at comparable fuel/air (pre combustion) ratios with standard gasoline. Anyone with an E85 compatible vehicle can attest to the fact that their milage goes down tha crapper when running E85 since the injectors have to be pulsed twice as fast(more fuel sprayed) to achieve the standard air/fuel ratio(post combustion). Ethanol is just not economical with standard automobiles. Propane injection, or hybrid is the only viable solution.
[email="chevelle.h@gmail.com"][color="red"]MAIL[/color][/email]
User avatar
Err
Life Member
Posts: 5842
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:54 am

Post by Err »

Key Keeper wrote: There is usually ice forming on the intake manifold and compression ratios on dirt track engines are usually very high (cept the cheap a$$ dirtballers).
I alcohol-fuel dragsters, the crew will actually spray de-icer on the butterflys after the burnout because if they don't, there's a chance they will freeze during the run.

I want a car that runs on dreams like this guy built.
Post Reply