Alright, a little discussion on the Anthrax issue...
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2001 11:10 pm
Something bother's me about the Anthrax cases. Some observations:
- If this is a terrorist bio attack then it's terribly planned and excuted. Heck, out of 3 tries they killed one person. Not to be morbid, but the Unibomber did better than that with conventional explosives.
- Targets so far have been two news organizations (well, one really since the Enquirer doesn't count) and one of Microsoft's offices. They have little tactical or fear value. A better target (for a terrorist) you would think is a government office or banking institution.
- The method of delivery seems to be very poor. Anthrax requires aeresol air dispersement large concentrations (anthrax is not lethal except in very large concentrations in it's natural form and even in weaponized anthrax you still need fairly high concentrations and to finely aeresol it.
- The timing was lousy. Right after the attack on Afganistan is a terrible time to do it - everyone was on guard for suspicious packages already and they just got lucky with the first guy, and even so all they got was one person. Poor implementation for the risks and costs taken.
So some theories that may be full of hot air - just speculating, see what you think:
- Maybe this was done by some home-grown wackos. Some militia maybe who wants to take advantage of the terrorist situation to put the fear of God in people without doing much harm - hoping it'll rile us up more and (oh I dunno) maybe they hope for easing of gun restrictions, or just general anarchy in the government or just to scare people into being more vigilant?
Some of these people are really twisted and may think they're doing a patriotic thing - one or two deaths in the hope that we'll blame it on the terrorists and be ever more vigilant?
- If this was done by terrorists then it's maybe Iraqi terrorists? We know Iraq was creating Anthrax at one time. Maybe they made some, stashed it away. Not enough to use in a warhead on Isreal maybe (I doubt they have the proper aerosol delivery system anyway), but enough to mess with our minds a bit?
- Ditto above but Bin Laden's people are behind it (I have a problem with that - compared to the WTC attack this is a pretty lame effort - other than raising our concsiousness about bio-weapons, and making us a bit antsy, what have they accomplished?).
I dunno, overall this anthrax thing feels amaturish. Like they thought it would be more deadly and harder to detect than it was, and that we wouldn't be wary of strange packages in this environment.
If nothing else this has shown that the health system in this country is on the ball for having so quickly detected and dealt with this. It's also shown that while Anthrax is a deadly bacteria, it isn't the instant death weapon we all assumed it to be. It's very difficult to deliver properly - unless it's aeresolized inn in high concentrations, it doesn't seem to be a very easy weapon to use as a terrorist tool.
Don't forget that weaponized Anthrax is designed to be aeresolled by a very specially designed artillery shell, missile or bomb. We and the russians spent more time developing the delivery systems than we did on making the Anthrax.
One of my first reactions to the WTC attack originally was "What would have happened if there were a couple of boxes of Anthrax in one of those planes?". Well now after some research I know the answer is NOTHING. The situation just wasn't conducive to releasing concentrations of Anthrax in a sufficently aeresolled condition that would be lethal on anything but a small scale.
I'm worried now more about missing Soviet made tactical (back-pack) nukes, but at least - small as they are - they're relatively easy to detect.
Your thoughts?
- If this is a terrorist bio attack then it's terribly planned and excuted. Heck, out of 3 tries they killed one person. Not to be morbid, but the Unibomber did better than that with conventional explosives.
- Targets so far have been two news organizations (well, one really since the Enquirer doesn't count) and one of Microsoft's offices. They have little tactical or fear value. A better target (for a terrorist) you would think is a government office or banking institution.
- The method of delivery seems to be very poor. Anthrax requires aeresol air dispersement large concentrations (anthrax is not lethal except in very large concentrations in it's natural form and even in weaponized anthrax you still need fairly high concentrations and to finely aeresol it.
- The timing was lousy. Right after the attack on Afganistan is a terrible time to do it - everyone was on guard for suspicious packages already and they just got lucky with the first guy, and even so all they got was one person. Poor implementation for the risks and costs taken.
So some theories that may be full of hot air - just speculating, see what you think:
- Maybe this was done by some home-grown wackos. Some militia maybe who wants to take advantage of the terrorist situation to put the fear of God in people without doing much harm - hoping it'll rile us up more and (oh I dunno) maybe they hope for easing of gun restrictions, or just general anarchy in the government or just to scare people into being more vigilant?
Some of these people are really twisted and may think they're doing a patriotic thing - one or two deaths in the hope that we'll blame it on the terrorists and be ever more vigilant?
- If this was done by terrorists then it's maybe Iraqi terrorists? We know Iraq was creating Anthrax at one time. Maybe they made some, stashed it away. Not enough to use in a warhead on Isreal maybe (I doubt they have the proper aerosol delivery system anyway), but enough to mess with our minds a bit?
- Ditto above but Bin Laden's people are behind it (I have a problem with that - compared to the WTC attack this is a pretty lame effort - other than raising our concsiousness about bio-weapons, and making us a bit antsy, what have they accomplished?).
I dunno, overall this anthrax thing feels amaturish. Like they thought it would be more deadly and harder to detect than it was, and that we wouldn't be wary of strange packages in this environment.
If nothing else this has shown that the health system in this country is on the ball for having so quickly detected and dealt with this. It's also shown that while Anthrax is a deadly bacteria, it isn't the instant death weapon we all assumed it to be. It's very difficult to deliver properly - unless it's aeresolized inn in high concentrations, it doesn't seem to be a very easy weapon to use as a terrorist tool.
Don't forget that weaponized Anthrax is designed to be aeresolled by a very specially designed artillery shell, missile or bomb. We and the russians spent more time developing the delivery systems than we did on making the Anthrax.
One of my first reactions to the WTC attack originally was "What would have happened if there were a couple of boxes of Anthrax in one of those planes?". Well now after some research I know the answer is NOTHING. The situation just wasn't conducive to releasing concentrations of Anthrax in a sufficently aeresolled condition that would be lethal on anything but a small scale.
I'm worried now more about missing Soviet made tactical (back-pack) nukes, but at least - small as they are - they're relatively easy to detect.
Your thoughts?